Re: [RFC PATCH] cpufreq: mark duplicate frequencies as invalid and continue as normal

[Viresh Kumar]

On 23-10-19, 10:06, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> I agree, we shouldn't. But this is in IKS which is built in the merged
> table by the driver. We can fix that, but found this easier and simple.
> And since it was allowed when the driver was merged, just thought of
> checking the details with you.

That was 7 years back :)

Yeah, lets fix IKS tables then instead of adding that to the core.

-- 
viresh