[PATCH v2 2/2] cpufreq: vexpress-spc: find and skip duplicates when merging frequencies
From: Sudeep Holla
Date: Wed Oct 23 2019 - 08:19:19 EST
Currently the cpufreq core aborts the validation and return error
immediately when it encounter duplicate frequency table entries.
This change was introduced long back since commit da0c6dc00c69
("cpufreq: Handle sorted frequency tables more efficiently").
However, this missed the testing with modified firmware for long time.
Inorder to make it work with default settings, we need to ensure the
merged table for bL switcher contains no duplicates. Find the duplicates
and skip them when merging the frequenct tables of A15 and A7 clusters.
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx>
---
drivers/cpufreq/vexpress-spc-cpufreq.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
v1->v2:
- Removed loop unrolling for clusters
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/vexpress-spc-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/vexpress-spc-cpufreq.c
index 093ef8d3a8d4..506e3f2bf53a 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/vexpress-spc-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/vexpress-spc-cpufreq.c
@@ -242,6 +242,19 @@ static inline u32 get_table_max(struct cpufreq_frequency_table *table)
return max_freq;
}
+static bool search_frequency(struct cpufreq_frequency_table *table, int size,
+ unsigned int freq)
+{
+ int count;
+
+ for (count = 0; count < size; count++) {
+ if (table[count].frequency == freq)
+ return true;
+ }
+
+ return false;
+}
+
static int merge_cluster_tables(void)
{
int i, j, k = 0, count = 1;
@@ -257,10 +270,13 @@ static int merge_cluster_tables(void)
freq_table[MAX_CLUSTERS] = table;
/* Add in reverse order to get freqs in increasing order */
- for (i = MAX_CLUSTERS - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
+ for (i = MAX_CLUSTERS - 1; i >= 0; i--, count = k) {
for (j = 0; freq_table[i][j].frequency != CPUFREQ_TABLE_END;
- j++, k++) {
- table[k].frequency =
+ j++) {
+ if (i == A15_CLUSTER &&
+ search_frequency(table, count, freq_table[i][j].frequency))
+ continue; /* skip duplicates */
+ table[k++].frequency =
VIRT_FREQ(i, freq_table[i][j].frequency);
}
}
--
2.17.1