Re: [PATCH v4] mfd: mt6360: add pmic mt6360 driver

[Wolfram Sang]

> > +	for (i = 0; i < MT6360_SLAVE_MAX; i++) {
> > +		if (mt6360_slave_addr[i] == client->addr) {
> > +			mpd->i2c[i] = client;
> > +			continue;
> > +		}

Not knowing the DT bindings, I wonder if we can let the for-loop start
at 1 and do beforehand:
	mpd->i2c[0] = client;

That would save the above if block. However, this is a minor nit.


> > +		mpd->i2c[i] = i2c_new_dummy(client->adapter,
> > +					    mt6360_slave_addr[i]);

Please use the new API i2c_new_dummy_device here...

> > +		if (!mpd->i2c[i]) {

... and IS_ERR() here.

> > +			dev_err(&client->dev, "new i2c dev [%d] fail\n", i);
> > +			ret = -ENODEV;

Then you can also return a proper errno value.

You can probably also use devm_i2c_new_dummy_device()...


> > +			goto out;
> > +		}
> > +		i2c_set_clientdata(mpd->i2c[i], mpd);
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	ret = devm_mfd_add_devices(&client->dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO,
> > +				   mt6360_devs, ARRAY_SIZE(mt6360_devs), NULL,
> > +				   0, regmap_irq_get_domain(mpd->irq_data));
> > +	if (ret < 0) {
> > +		dev_err(&client->dev, "mfd add cells fail\n");
> > +		goto out;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +out:
> > +	while (--i >= 0) {
> > +		if (mpd->i2c[i]->addr == client->addr)
> > +			continue;
> > +		i2c_unregister_device(mpd->i2c[i]);

... to save this ...

> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int mt6360_pmu_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
> > +{
> > +	struct mt6360_pmu_data *mpd = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> > +	int i;
> > +
> > +	for (i = 0; i < MT6360_SLAVE_MAX; i++) {
> > +		if (mpd->i2c[i]->addr == client->addr)
> > +			continue;
> > +		i2c_unregister_device(mpd->i2c[i]);
> > +	}

... and this. But please double check.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature