[PATCH 5.3 129/197] drm/i915/userptr: Never allow userptr into the mappable GGTT

From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Sun Oct 27 2019 - 17:23:08 EST

From: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

commit 4f2a572eda67aecb1e7e4fc26cc985fb8158f6e8 upstream.

Daniel Vetter uncovered a nasty cycle in using the mmu-notifiers to
invalidate userptr objects which also happen to be pulled into GGTT
mmaps. That is when we unbind the userptr object (on mmu invalidation),
we revoke all CPU mmaps, which may then recurse into mmu invalidation.

We looked for ways of breaking the cycle, but the revocation on
invalidation is required and cannot be avoided. The only solution we
could see was to not allow such GGTT bindings of userptr objects in the
first place. In practice, no one really wants to use a GGTT mmapping of
a CPU pointer...

Just before Daniel's explosive lockdep patches land in v5.4-rc1, we got
a genuine blip from CI:

<4>[ 246.793958] ======================================================
<4>[ 246.793972] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
<4>[ 246.793989] 5.3.0-gbd6c56f50d15-drmtip_372+ #1 Tainted: G U
<4>[ 246.794003] ------------------------------------------------------
<4>[ 246.794017] kswapd0/145 is trying to acquire lock:
<4>[ 246.794030] 000000003f565be6 (&dev->struct_mutex/1){+.+.}, at: userptr_mn_invalidate_range_start+0x18f/0x220 [i915]
<4>[ 246.794250]
but task is already holding lock:
<4>[ 246.794263] 000000001799cef9 (&anon_vma->rwsem){++++}, at: page_lock_anon_vma_read+0xe6/0x2a0
<4>[ 246.794291]
which lock already depends on the new lock.

<4>[ 246.794307]
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
<4>[ 246.794322]
-> #3 (&anon_vma->rwsem){++++}:
<4>[ 246.794344] down_write+0x33/0x70
<4>[ 246.794357] __vma_adjust+0x3d9/0x7b0
<4>[ 246.794370] __split_vma+0x16a/0x180
<4>[ 246.794385] mprotect_fixup+0x2a5/0x320
<4>[ 246.794399] do_mprotect_pkey+0x208/0x2e0
<4>[ 246.794413] __x64_sys_mprotect+0x16/0x20
<4>[ 246.794429] do_syscall_64+0x55/0x1c0
<4>[ 246.794443] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
<4>[ 246.794456]
-> #2 (&mapping->i_mmap_rwsem){++++}:
<4>[ 246.794478] down_write+0x33/0x70
<4>[ 246.794493] unmap_mapping_pages+0x48/0x130
<4>[ 246.794519] i915_vma_revoke_mmap+0x81/0x1b0 [i915]
<4>[ 246.794519] i915_vma_unbind+0x11d/0x4a0 [i915]
<4>[ 246.794519] i915_vma_destroy+0x31/0x300 [i915]
<4>[ 246.794519] __i915_gem_free_objects+0xb8/0x4b0 [i915]
<4>[ 246.794519] drm_file_free.part.0+0x1e6/0x290
<4>[ 246.794519] drm_release+0xa6/0xe0
<4>[ 246.794519] __fput+0xc2/0x250
<4>[ 246.794519] task_work_run+0x82/0xb0
<4>[ 246.794519] do_exit+0x35b/0xdb0
<4>[ 246.794519] do_group_exit+0x34/0xb0
<4>[ 246.794519] __x64_sys_exit_group+0xf/0x10
<4>[ 246.794519] do_syscall_64+0x55/0x1c0
<4>[ 246.794519] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
<4>[ 246.794519]
-> #1 (&vm->mutex){+.+.}:
<4>[ 246.794519] i915_gem_shrinker_taints_mutex+0x6d/0xe0 [i915]
<4>[ 246.794519] i915_address_space_init+0x9f/0x160 [i915]
<4>[ 246.794519] i915_ggtt_init_hw+0x55/0x170 [i915]
<4>[ 246.794519] i915_driver_probe+0xc9f/0x1620 [i915]
<4>[ 246.794519] i915_pci_probe+0x43/0x1b0 [i915]
<4>[ 246.794519] pci_device_probe+0x9e/0x120
<4>[ 246.794519] really_probe+0xea/0x3d0
<4>[ 246.794519] driver_probe_device+0x10b/0x120
<4>[ 246.794519] device_driver_attach+0x4a/0x50
<4>[ 246.794519] __driver_attach+0x97/0x130
<4>[ 246.794519] bus_for_each_dev+0x74/0xc0
<4>[ 246.794519] bus_add_driver+0x13f/0x210
<4>[ 246.794519] driver_register+0x56/0xe0
<4>[ 246.794519] do_one_initcall+0x58/0x300
<4>[ 246.794519] do_init_module+0x56/0x1f6
<4>[ 246.794519] load_module+0x25bd/0x2a40
<4>[ 246.794519] __se_sys_finit_module+0xd3/0xf0
<4>[ 246.794519] do_syscall_64+0x55/0x1c0
<4>[ 246.794519] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
<4>[ 246.794519]
-> #0 (&dev->struct_mutex/1){+.+.}:
<4>[ 246.794519] __lock_acquire+0x15d8/0x1e90
<4>[ 246.794519] lock_acquire+0xa6/0x1c0
<4>[ 246.794519] __mutex_lock+0x9d/0x9b0
<4>[ 246.794519] userptr_mn_invalidate_range_start+0x18f/0x220 [i915]
<4>[ 246.794519] __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start+0x85/0x110
<4>[ 246.794519] try_to_unmap_one+0x76b/0x860
<4>[ 246.794519] rmap_walk_anon+0x104/0x280
<4>[ 246.794519] try_to_unmap+0xc0/0xf0
<4>[ 246.794519] shrink_page_list+0x561/0xc10
<4>[ 246.794519] shrink_inactive_list+0x220/0x440
<4>[ 246.794519] shrink_node_memcg+0x36e/0x740
<4>[ 246.794519] shrink_node+0xcb/0x490
<4>[ 246.794519] balance_pgdat+0x241/0x580
<4>[ 246.794519] kswapd+0x16c/0x530
<4>[ 246.794519] kthread+0x119/0x130
<4>[ 246.794519] ret_from_fork+0x24/0x50
<4>[ 246.794519]
other info that might help us debug this:

<4>[ 246.794519] Chain exists of:
&dev->struct_mutex/1 --> &mapping->i_mmap_rwsem --> &anon_vma->rwsem

<4>[ 246.794519] Possible unsafe locking scenario:

<4>[ 246.794519] CPU0 CPU1
<4>[ 246.794519] ---- ----
<4>[ 246.794519] lock(&anon_vma->rwsem);
<4>[ 246.794519] lock(&mapping->i_mmap_rwsem);
<4>[ 246.794519] lock(&anon_vma->rwsem);
<4>[ 246.794519] lock(&dev->struct_mutex/1);
<4>[ 246.794519]
*** DEADLOCK ***

v2: Say no to mmap_ioctl

Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111744
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111870
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190928082546.3473-1-chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(cherry picked from commit a4311745bba9763e3c965643d4531bd5765b0513)
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c | 7 +++++++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h | 6 ++++++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object_types.h | 3 ++-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_userptr.c | 1 +
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 3 +++
5 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c
@@ -365,6 +365,7 @@ err:
return VM_FAULT_OOM;
case -ENOSPC:
case -EFAULT:
+ case -ENODEV: /* bad object, how did you get here! */
return VM_FAULT_SIGBUS;
default:
WARN_ONCE(ret, "unhandled error in %s: %i\n", __func__, ret);
@@ -475,10 +476,16 @@ i915_gem_mmap_gtt(struct drm_file *file,
if (!obj)
return -ENOENT;

+ if (i915_gem_object_never_bind_ggtt(obj)) {
+ ret = -ENODEV;
+ goto out;
+ }
+
ret = create_mmap_offset(obj);
if (ret == 0)
*offset = drm_vma_node_offset_addr(&obj->base.vma_node);

+out:
i915_gem_object_put(obj);
return ret;
}
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h
@@ -153,6 +153,12 @@ i915_gem_object_is_proxy(const struct dr
}

static inline bool
+i915_gem_object_never_bind_ggtt(const struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
+{
+ return obj->ops->flags & I915_GEM_OBJECT_NO_GGTT;
+}
+
+static inline bool
i915_gem_object_needs_async_cancel(const struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
{
return obj->ops->flags & I915_GEM_OBJECT_ASYNC_CANCEL;
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object_types.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object_types.h
@@ -31,7 +31,8 @@ struct drm_i915_gem_object_ops {
#define I915_GEM_OBJECT_HAS_STRUCT_PAGE BIT(0)
#define I915_GEM_OBJECT_IS_SHRINKABLE BIT(1)
#define I915_GEM_OBJECT_IS_PROXY BIT(2)
-#define I915_GEM_OBJECT_ASYNC_CANCEL BIT(3)
+#define I915_GEM_OBJECT_NO_GGTT BIT(3)
+#define I915_GEM_OBJECT_ASYNC_CANCEL BIT(4)

/* Interface between the GEM object and its backing storage.
* get_pages() is called once prior to the use of the associated set
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_userptr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_userptr.c
@@ -694,6 +694,7 @@ i915_gem_userptr_dmabuf_export(struct dr
static const struct drm_i915_gem_object_ops i915_gem_userptr_ops = {
.flags = I915_GEM_OBJECT_HAS_STRUCT_PAGE |
I915_GEM_OBJECT_IS_SHRINKABLE |
+ I915_GEM_OBJECT_NO_GGTT |
I915_GEM_OBJECT_ASYNC_CANCEL,
.get_pages = i915_gem_userptr_get_pages,
.put_pages = i915_gem_userptr_put_pages,
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
@@ -1030,6 +1030,9 @@ i915_gem_object_ggtt_pin(struct drm_i915

lockdep_assert_held(&obj->base.dev->struct_mutex);

+ if (i915_gem_object_never_bind_ggtt(obj))
+ return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
+
if (flags & PIN_MAPPABLE &&
(!view || view->type == I915_GGTT_VIEW_NORMAL)) {
/* If the required space is larger than the available