Re: [RFC 01/10] autonuma: Fix watermark checking in migrate_balanced_pgdat()

From: Mel Gorman
Date: Fri Nov 01 2019 - 07:11:50 EST


On Fri, Nov 01, 2019 at 03:57:18PM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote:
> From: Huang Ying <ying.huang@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> When zone_watermark_ok() is called in migrate_balanced_pgdat() to
> check migration target node, the parameter classzone_idx (for
> requested zone) is specified as 0 (ZONE_DMA). But when allocating
> memory for autonuma in alloc_misplaced_dst_page(), the requested zone
> from GFP flags is ZONE_MOVABLE. That is, the requested zone is
> different. The size of lowmem_reserve for the different requested
> zone is different. And this may cause some issues.
>
> For example, in the zoneinfo of a test machine as below,
>
> Node 0, zone DMA32
> pages free 61592
> min 29
> low 454
> high 879
> spanned 1044480
> present 442306
> managed 425921
> protection: (0, 0, 62457, 62457, 62457)
>
> The free page number of ZONE_DMA32 is greater than "high watermark +
> lowmem_reserve[ZONE_DMA]", but less than "high watermark +
> lowmem_reserve[ZONE_MOVABLE]". And because __alloc_pages_node() in
> alloc_misplaced_dst_page() requests ZONE_MOVABLE, the
> zone_watermark_ok() on ZONE_DMA32 in migrate_balanced_pgdat() may
> always return true. So, autonuma may not stop even when memory
> pressure in node 0 is heavy.
>
> To fix the issue, ZONE_MOVABLE is used as parameter to call
> zone_watermark_ok() in migrate_balanced_pgdat(). This makes it same
> as requested zone in alloc_misplaced_dst_page(). So that
> migrate_balanced_pgdat() returns false when memory pressure is heavy.
>
> Signed-off-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@xxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxx>

This patch is independent of the series and should be resent separately.
Alternatively Andrew, please pick this patch up on its own.

--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs