Re: [PATCHv7 0/3] QCOM smmu-500 wait-for-safe handling for sdm845

From: Sai Prakash Ranjan
Date: Mon Nov 04 2019 - 00:37:57 EST


On 2019-11-04 10:49, Andy Gross wrote:
On Fri, Nov 01, 2019 at 11:01:59PM +0530, Sai Prakash Ranjan wrote:
>>> What's the plan for getting this merged? I'm not happy taking the
>>> firmware
>>> bits without Andy's ack, but I also think the SMMU changes should go via
>>> the IOMMU tree to avoid conflicts.
>>>
>>> Andy?
>>>
>>
>>Bjorn maintains QCOM stuff now if I am not wrong and he has already
>>reviewed
>>the firmware bits. So I'm hoping you could take all these through IOMMU
>>tree.
>
>Oh, I didn't realise that. Is there a MAINTAINERS update someplace? If I
>run:
>
>$ ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl -f drivers/firmware/qcom_scm-64.c
>
>in linux-next, I get:
>
>Andy Gross <agross@xxxxxxxxxx> (maintainer:ARM/QUALCOMM SUPPORT)
>linux-arm-msm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (open list:ARM/QUALCOMM SUPPORT)
>linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (open list)
>

It hasn't been updated yet then. I will leave it to Bjorn or Andy to comment
on this.

The rumors of my demise have been greatly exaggerated. All kidding aside, I
ack'ed both. Bjorn will indeed be coming on as a co-maintener at some point.
He has already done a lot of yeomans work in helping me out the past 3 months.


Thanks for the acks and sorry for that exaggeration :p

-Sai

--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation