Re: [PATCH 05/13] KVM: monolithic: add more section prefixes

[Paolo Bonzini]

On 04/11/19 23:59, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> Add more section prefixes because with the monolithic KVM model the
> section checker can now do a more accurate static analysis at build
> time and this allows to build without
> CONFIG_SECTION_MISMATCH_WARN_ONLY=n.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c | 2 +-
>  arch/x86/kvm/x86.c        | 4 ++--
>  include/linux/kvm_host.h  | 8 ++++----
>  virt/kvm/arm/arm.c        | 2 +-
>  virt/kvm/kvm_main.c       | 6 +++---
>  5 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c
> index ec2547cc5ecb..e80e9504722a 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c
> @@ -1067,7 +1067,7 @@ int kvm_irq_map_chip_pin(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned irqchip, unsigned pin)
>  
>  #endif /* CONFIG_KVM_XICS */
>  
> -static int kvmppc_book3s_init(void)
> +static __init int kvmppc_book3s_init(void)
>  {
>  	int r;
>  
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index fb963e6b2e54..5e98fa6b7bf8 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -9272,7 +9272,7 @@ void kvm_arch_hardware_disable(void)
>  	drop_user_return_notifiers();
>  }
>  
> -int kvm_arch_hardware_setup(void)
> +__init int kvm_arch_hardware_setup(void)
>  {
>  	int r;
>  
> @@ -9303,7 +9303,7 @@ void kvm_arch_hardware_unsetup(void)
>  	kvm_x86_hardware_unsetup();
>  }
>  
> -int kvm_arch_check_processor_compat(void)
> +__init int kvm_arch_check_processor_compat(void)
>  {
>  	return kvm_x86_check_processor_compatibility();
>  }
> diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> index 719fc3e15ea4..426bc2f485a9 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> @@ -616,8 +616,8 @@ static inline void kvm_irqfd_exit(void)
>  {
>  }
>  #endif
> -int kvm_init(void *opaque, unsigned vcpu_size, unsigned vcpu_align,
> -		  struct module *module);
> +__init int kvm_init(void *opaque, unsigned vcpu_size, unsigned vcpu_align,
> +		    struct module *module);
>  void kvm_exit(void);
>  
>  void kvm_get_kvm(struct kvm *kvm);
> @@ -867,9 +867,9 @@ void kvm_arch_create_vcpu_debugfs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  
>  int kvm_arch_hardware_enable(void);
>  void kvm_arch_hardware_disable(void);
> -int kvm_arch_hardware_setup(void);
> +__init int kvm_arch_hardware_setup(void);
>  void kvm_arch_hardware_unsetup(void);
> -int kvm_arch_check_processor_compat(void);
> +__init int kvm_arch_check_processor_compat(void);
>  int kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  bool kvm_arch_vcpu_in_kernel(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  int kvm_arch_vcpu_should_kick(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
> index 86c6aa1cb58e..65f7f0f6868d 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
> @@ -1726,7 +1726,7 @@ void kvm_arch_exit(void)
>  	kvm_perf_teardown();
>  }
>  
> -static int arm_init(void)
> +static __init int arm_init(void)
>  {
>  	int rc = kvm_init(NULL, sizeof(struct kvm_vcpu), 0, THIS_MODULE);
>  	return rc;
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> index d6f0696d98ef..1b7fbd138406 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> @@ -4246,13 +4246,13 @@ static void kvm_sched_out(struct preempt_notifier *pn,
>  	kvm_arch_vcpu_put(vcpu);
>  }
>  
> -static void check_processor_compat(void *rtn)
> +static __init void check_processor_compat(void *rtn)
>  {
>  	*(int *)rtn = kvm_arch_check_processor_compat();
>  }
>  
> -int kvm_init(void *opaque, unsigned vcpu_size, unsigned vcpu_align,
> -		  struct module *module)
> +__init int kvm_init(void *opaque, unsigned vcpu_size, unsigned vcpu_align,
> +		    struct module *module)
>  {
>  	int r;
>  	int cpu;
> 

Queued, thanks.

Paolo