Re: [PATCH 05/50] arm: Add loglvl to unwind_backtrace()

From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin
Date: Wed Nov 06 2019 - 04:13:19 EST


On Wed, Nov 06, 2019 at 03:04:56AM +0000, Dmitry Safonov wrote:
> Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
> realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
> lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on
> a platform or user).
>
> Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
> side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
> temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages.
> And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs,
> but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk()
> was deferred.
>
> Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems
> an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers.
> Also, it will consolidate printings with headers.
>
> Add log level argument to unwind_backtrace() as a preparation for
> introducing show_stack_loglvl().
>
> As a good side-effect arm_syscall() is now printing errors with the same
> log level as the backtrace.
>
> Cc: Russell King <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: clang-built-linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@xxxxxxxxxx/T/#u
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm/include/asm/unwind.h | 3 ++-
> arch/arm/kernel/traps.c | 6 +++---
> arch/arm/kernel/unwind.c | 7 ++++---
> 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/unwind.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/unwind.h
> index 6e282c33126b..0f8a3439902d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/unwind.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/unwind.h
> @@ -36,7 +36,8 @@ extern struct unwind_table *unwind_table_add(unsigned long start,
> unsigned long text_addr,
> unsigned long text_size);
> extern void unwind_table_del(struct unwind_table *tab);
> -extern void unwind_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk);
> +extern void unwind_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk,
> + const char *loglvl);
>
> #endif /* !__ASSEMBLY__ */
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/traps.c b/arch/arm/kernel/traps.c
> index 7c3f32b26585..69e35462c9e9 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/traps.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/traps.c
> @@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ static void dump_instr(const char *lvl, struct pt_regs *regs)
> #ifdef CONFIG_ARM_UNWIND
> static inline void dump_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk)
> {
> - unwind_backtrace(regs, tsk);
> + unwind_backtrace(regs, tsk, KERN_DEBUG);

Why demote this to debug level? This is used as part of the kernel
panic message, surely we don't want this at debug level? What about
the non-unwind version?

> }
> #else
> static void dump_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk)
> @@ -660,10 +660,10 @@ asmlinkage int arm_syscall(int no, struct pt_regs *regs)
> if (user_debug & UDBG_SYSCALL) {
> pr_err("[%d] %s: arm syscall %d\n",
> task_pid_nr(current), current->comm, no);
> - dump_instr("", regs);
> + dump_instr(KERN_ERR, regs);
> if (user_mode(regs)) {
> __show_regs(regs);
> - c_backtrace(frame_pointer(regs), processor_mode(regs), NULL);
> + c_backtrace(frame_pointer(regs), processor_mode(regs), KERN_ERR);
> }
> }
> #endif
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/unwind.c b/arch/arm/kernel/unwind.c
> index 0a65005e10f0..caaae1b6f721 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/unwind.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/unwind.c
> @@ -455,11 +455,12 @@ int unwind_frame(struct stackframe *frame)
> return URC_OK;
> }
>
> -void unwind_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk)
> +void unwind_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk,
> + const char *loglvl)
> {
> struct stackframe frame;
>
> - pr_debug("%s(regs = %p tsk = %p)\n", __func__, regs, tsk);
> + printk("%s%s(regs = %p tsk = %p)\n", loglvl, __func__, regs, tsk);

Clearly, this isn't supposed to be part of the normal backtrace output...

Overall impression at this point is really not good.

--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up