Re: NULL pointer dereference in pick_next_task_fair

[Quentin Perret]

On Friday 08 Nov 2019 at 11:47:44 (+0000), Valentin Schneider wrote:
> I think we can ignore RETRY_TASK because this happens before the picking loop,
> so we'll observe any new DL/RT task that got enqueued while newidle released
> the lock. This also means we can safely break the balance loop in
> pick_next_task() when we get RETRY_TASK, because we've got something to pick
> (some new RT/DL task).

Ah right, the second loop always iterates from DL, so that works.

> This wants a comment though, methinks.

+1 :)

Thanks,
Quentin