Re: [PATCH] staging: fbtft: Remove set but not used variable 'ret'
From: Greg KH
Date: Mon Nov 11 2019 - 10:40:41 EST
On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 06:57:07PM +0800, Zheng Yongjun wrote:
> Fixes gcc '-Wunused-but-set-variable' warning:
>
> drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_ili9320.c: In function read_devicecode:
> drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_ili9320.c:25:6: warning: variable ret set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
>
> ret is never used, so remove it.
>
> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Zheng Yongjun <zhengyongjun3@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_ili9320.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_ili9320.c b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_ili9320.c
> index f2e72d14431d..f0ebc40857b3 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_ili9320.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_ili9320.c
> @@ -22,11 +22,10 @@
>
> static unsigned int read_devicecode(struct fbtft_par *par)
> {
> - int ret;
> u8 rxbuf[8] = {0, };
>
> write_reg(par, 0x0000);
> - ret = par->fbtftops.read(par, rxbuf, 4);
> + par->fbtftops.read(par, rxbuf, 4);
> return (rxbuf[2] << 8) | rxbuf[3];
> }
>
If the read call can fail, shouldn't you be passing back the error
value instead?
thanks,
greg k-h
> --
> 2.23.0
>