Re: [PATCH] perf report: Fix segfault with '-F phys_daddr'
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Date: Tue Nov 12 2019 - 06:04:24 EST
Em Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 11:19:46AM +0530, Ravi Bangoria escreveu:
> If perf.data file is not recorded with mem-info, adding 'phys_daddr'
> to output field in perf report results in segfault. Fix that.
>
> Before:
> $ ./perf record ls
> $ ./perf report -F +phys_daddr
> Segmentation fault (core dumped)
>
> After:
> $ ./perf report -F +phys_daddr
> Samples: 11 of event 'cycles:u', Event count (approx.): 1485821
> Overhead Data Physical Address Command Shared Object Symbol
> 22.57% [.] 0000000000000000 ls libc-2.29.so [.] __strcoll_l
> 21.87% [.] 0000000000000000 ls ld-2.29.so [.] _dl_relocate_object
> ...
Shouldn't we instead just bail out and state that this isn't possible
and leave the user wondering why what was asked isn't presented?
- Arnaldo
> Fixes: 8780fb25ab06 ("perf sort: Add sort option for physical address")
> Signed-off-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> tools/perf/util/sort.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/sort.c b/tools/perf/util/sort.c
> index 43d1d410854a..c2430676e569 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/sort.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/sort.c
> @@ -1413,7 +1413,7 @@ static int hist_entry__phys_daddr_snprintf(struct hist_entry *he, char *bf,
> size_t ret = 0;
> size_t len = BITS_PER_LONG / 4;
>
> - addr = he->mem_info->daddr.phys_addr;
> + addr = he->mem_info ? he->mem_info->daddr.phys_addr : 0;
>
> ret += repsep_snprintf(bf + ret, size - ret, "[%c] ", he->level);
>
> --
> 2.21.0
--
- Arnaldo