RE: [EXT] Re: [net-next, 1/2] enetc: Configure the Time-Aware Scheduler via tc-taprio offload

[Claudiu Manoil]

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Po Liu <po.liu@xxxxxxx>
[...]
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Simon Horman <simon.horman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[...]
>> > +/* class 5, command 0 */
>> > +struct tgs_gcl_conf {
>> > +     u8      atc;    /* init gate value */
>> > +     u8      res[7];
>> > +     union {
>> > +             struct {
>> > +                     u8      res1[4];
>> > +                     __le16  acl_len;
>>
>> Given that u* types are used in this structure I think le16 would be more
>> appropriate than __le16.
>
>Here keep the same code style of this .h file. I think it is better to have
>another patch to fix them all. Do you agree?
>

I don't see why "le16" would be more appropriate than "__le16" in this context.
The "__leXX" types are widely used in kernel drivers and not only, to annotate the
endianess of the hardware.  These are generic types defined din "include/uapi/linux/types.h".
Whereas "leXX" are defined in "fs/ntfs/types.h", and there's no usage of these types
in other h/w device drivers (I didn't find any).  Am I missing anything?

-Claudiu