Re: [PATCH] arm64: Kconfig: add a choice for endianess
From: Will Deacon
Date: Tue Nov 12 2019 - 12:28:01 EST
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 04:24:31PM +0000, John Garry wrote:
> On 12/11/2019 16:01, Anders Roxell wrote:
> > When building allmodconfig KCONFIG_ALLCONFIG=$(pwd)/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
> > CONFIG_CPU_BIG_ENDIAN gets enabled. Which tends not to be what most
> > people wants. Another concern that thas come up is that ACPI in't built
>
> /s/wants/want/, s/thas/has/, s/in't/isn't/
>
> > for an allmodconfig kernel today since that also depends on !CPU_BIG_ENDIAN.
> >
> > Rework so that we introduce a 'choice' and default the choice to
> > CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN. That means that when we build an allmodconfig kernel
> > it will default to CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN that most people tends to want.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> FWIW, apart from spelling mistakes:
>
> Reviewed-by: John Garry <john.garry@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/Kconfig | 13 +++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> > index 64764ca92fca..62f83c234a61 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> > @@ -877,11 +877,24 @@ config ARM64_PA_BITS
> > default 48 if ARM64_PA_BITS_48
> > default 52 if ARM64_PA_BITS_52
> > +choice
> > + prompt "Endianess"
>
> Should this be "Endianness"?
>
> > + default CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN
> > + help
> > + Choose what mode you plan on running your kernel in.
While we're at it, I'd avoid the use of "mode" here since that has a
different meaning in the architecture, although I see we already use that
terminology for CPU_BIG_ENDIAN. How about:
"Select the endianness of data accesses performed by the CPU. Userspace
applications will need to be compiled and linked for the endianness
that is selected here.
Little-endian is compatible with x86, but big-endian is faster."
(ok, maybe drop that last sentence ;)
> > config CPU_BIG_ENDIAN
> > bool "Build big-endian kernel"
> > help
> > Say Y if you plan on running a kernel in big-endian mode.
Then this can be:
"Say Y if you plan on running a kernel with a big-endian userspace."
> > +config CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN
> > + bool "Build little-endian kernel"
> > + help
> > + Say Y if you plan on running a kernel in little-endian mode.
"Say Y if you plan on running a kernel with a little-endian userspace.
This is usually the case for distributions targetting arm64."
I think it's userspace that people really care about, so wording it in
terms of that makes most sense to me.
Will