Re: [PATCH] ARM: don't export unused return_address()
From: Geert Uytterhoeven
Date: Wed Nov 13 2019 - 08:15:15 EST
Hi Russell,
On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 12:45 PM Russell King - ARM Linux admin
<linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 08:40:39PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 11:31 PM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 5:47 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > Without the frame pointer enabled, return_address() is an inline
> > > > function and does not need to be exported, as shown by this warning:
> > > >
> > > > WARNING: "return_address" [vmlinux] is a static EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL
> > > >
> > > > Move the EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() into the #ifdef as well.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > Thanks for your patch!
> > >
> > > Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > > --- a/arch/arm/kernel/return_address.c
> > > > +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/return_address.c
> > > > @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ void *return_address(unsigned int level)
> > > > return NULL;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > >
> > > Checkpatch doesn't like the empty line above:
> > >
> > > WARNING: EXPORT_SYMBOL(foo); should immediately follow its function/variable
> > >
> > > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(return_address);
> > > > +
> > > > #endif /* if defined(CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER) && !defined(CONFIG_ARM_UNWIND) */
> > > >
> > > > -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(return_address);
> > What has happened to this patch?
> >
> > I still see this warning.
>
> Simple - it got merged, it caused build regressions, it got dropped.
> A new version is pending me doing another round of patch merging.
I believe that was not Arnd's patch, but Ben Dooks' alternative solution[*]?
[*] Commit 0b0617e5a610fe12 ("ARM: 8918/1: only build return_address() if
needed"), which I discovered in next-20191031 when checking if Arnd's
patch was applied....
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds