Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] Add required-opps support to devfreq passive gov

[Viresh Kumar]

On 14-11-19, 00:23, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> Thanks for checking. I haven't abandoned this patch series. This patch
> series depends on "lazy linking" of required-opps to avoid a cyclic
> dependency between devfreq and OPP table population. But Viresh wasn't
> happy with my implementation of the lazy liking for reasonable
> reasons.
> 
> I had a chat with Viresh during one of the several conferences that I
> met him at. To fix the lazy linking in the way he wanted it meant we
> had to fix other issues in the OPP framework that arise when OPP
> tables are shared in DT but not in memory. So he was kind enough to
> sign up to add lazy linking support to OPPs so that I won't have to do
> it. So, I'm waiting on that. So once that's added, I should be able to
> drop a few patches in this series, do some minor updates and then this
> will be good to go.

I am fixing few other issues in OPP core right now and lazy linking
is next in the list :)

-- 
viresh