Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] dt-bindings: pinctrl: intel: Add for new SoC

[Tanwar, Rahul]

On 15/11/2019 1:39 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 9:27 PM Tanwar, Rahul
> <rahul.tanwar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Linus,
>>
>> On 13/11/2019 10:46 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 11:11 AM Rahul Tanwar
>>> <rahul.tanwar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Add dt bindings document for pinmux & GPIO controller driver of
>>>> Intel Lightning Mountain SoC.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Rahul Tanwar <rahul.tanwar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> (...)
>>>
>>>> +properties:
>>>> +  compatible:
>>>> +    const: intel,lgm-pinctrl
>>> Just noted from another review where Rob noted that this name should
>>> match the internal name in the datasheet for this hardware block. Is it
>>> really called "lgm-pinctrl" inside Intel?
>>>
>>> intel,lightning-mountain-io and similar are perfectly fine if that is the
>>> name it has in your documentation.
>> Our documentation does not have any specific names for these hardware
>> blocks. It names it in a very generic/standard manner like GPIO, pinmux..
>>
>> To make the name explicit & self explanatory, i should probably change
>> the name as you suggested i.e. intel,lightning-mountain-io.
> You should also be consistent with 'lgm' vs. 'lightning-mountain' use
> across bindings some of which I think have already been accepted.
>

Yes, other accepted drivers/bindings use 'lgm'. I will rename it to
'intel,lgm-io'to be consistent.Thanks.

Regards,
Rahul