Re: [PATCH 3/9] sched/vtime: Handle nice updates under vtime
From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Fri Nov 15 2019 - 05:15:29 EST
On Wed, Nov 06, 2019 at 04:08:01AM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index 7880f4f64d0e..fa56a1bdd5d8 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -4488,6 +4488,7 @@ void set_user_nice(struct task_struct *p, long nice)
> int old_prio, delta;
> struct rq_flags rf;
> struct rq *rq;
> + int old_static;
>
> if (task_nice(p) == nice || nice < MIN_NICE || nice > MAX_NICE)
> return;
> @@ -4498,6 +4499,8 @@ void set_user_nice(struct task_struct *p, long nice)
> rq = task_rq_lock(p, &rf);
> update_rq_clock(rq);
>
> + old_static = p->static_prio;
> +
> /*
> * The RT priorities are set via sched_setscheduler(), but we still
> * allow the 'normal' nice value to be set - but as expected
> @@ -4532,7 +4535,9 @@ void set_user_nice(struct task_struct *p, long nice)
> }
> if (running)
> set_next_task(rq, p);
> +
> out_unlock:
> + vtime_set_nice(rq, p, old_static);
> task_rq_unlock(rq, p, &rf);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(set_user_nice);
> @@ -4668,8 +4673,8 @@ static struct task_struct *find_process_by_pid(pid_t pid)
> */
> #define SETPARAM_POLICY -1
>
> -static void __setscheduler_params(struct task_struct *p,
> - const struct sched_attr *attr)
> +static void __setscheduler_params(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p,
> + const struct sched_attr *attr)
> {
> int policy = attr->sched_policy;
>
> @@ -4680,8 +4685,11 @@ static void __setscheduler_params(struct task_struct *p,
>
> if (dl_policy(policy))
> __setparam_dl(p, attr);
> - else if (fair_policy(policy))
> + else if (fair_policy(policy)) {
> + int old_prio = p->static_prio;
> p->static_prio = NICE_TO_PRIO(attr->sched_nice);
> + vtime_set_nice(rq, p, old_prio);
> + }
>
> /*
> * __sched_setscheduler() ensures attr->sched_priority == 0 when
> @@ -4704,7 +4712,7 @@ static void __setscheduler(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p,
> if (attr->sched_flags & SCHED_FLAG_KEEP_PARAMS)
> return;
>
> - __setscheduler_params(p, attr);
> + __setscheduler_params(rq, p, attr);
>
> /*
> * Keep a potential priority boosting if called from
Would it make sense to add a helper like:
static void
__sched_set_nice(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *t, long nice)
{
int old_prio;
old_prio = t->static_prio;
t->static_prio = NICE_TO_PRIO(nice);
vtime_set_nice(rq, t, old_prio);
}