Re: [PATCH v1] Bluetooth: hci_qca: Enable clocks required for BT SOC

From: bgodavar
Date: Mon Nov 18 2019 - 01:01:57 EST


On 2019-11-14 14:25, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
Hi Balakrishna,

Instead of relying on other subsytem to turn ON clocks
required for BT SoC to operate, voting them from the driver.

Signed-off-by: Balakrishna Godavarthi <bgodavar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c
index f10bdf8e1fc5..dc95e378574b 100644
--- a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c
+++ b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c
@@ -164,6 +164,7 @@ struct qca_serdev {
};

static int qca_regulator_enable(struct qca_serdev *qcadev);
+static int qca_power_on(struct qca_serdev *qcadev);

I really dislike forward declaration. Only use them if they are really
really needed. That said, this driver might actually need cleanups
since I just realized it has tons of forward declarations.


[Bala]: agree, will work on this change.

static void qca_regulator_disable(struct qca_serdev *qcadev);
static void qca_power_shutdown(struct hci_uart *hu);
static int qca_power_off(struct hci_dev *hdev);
@@ -528,7 +529,7 @@ static int qca_open(struct hci_uart *hu)
} else {
hu->init_speed = qcadev->init_speed;
hu->oper_speed = qcadev->oper_speed;
- ret = qca_regulator_enable(qcadev);
+ ret = qca_power_on(qcadev);
if (ret) {
destroy_workqueue(qca->workqueue);
kfree_skb(qca->rx_skb);
@@ -1214,7 +1215,7 @@ static int qca_wcn3990_init(struct hci_uart *hu)
qcadev = serdev_device_get_drvdata(hu->serdev);
if (!qcadev->bt_power->vregs_on) {
serdev_device_close(hu->serdev);
- ret = qca_regulator_enable(qcadev);
+ ret = qca_power_on(qcadev);
if (ret)
return ret;

@@ -1408,6 +1409,9 @@ static void qca_power_shutdown(struct hci_uart *hu)
host_set_baudrate(hu, 2400);
qca_send_power_pulse(hu, false);
qca_regulator_disable(qcadev);
+
+ if (qcadev->susclk)
+ clk_disable_unprepare(qcadev->susclk);
}

static int qca_power_off(struct hci_dev *hdev)
@@ -1423,6 +1427,20 @@ static int qca_power_off(struct hci_dev *hdev)
return 0;
}

+static int qca_power_on(struct qca_serdev *qcadev)
+{
+ int err;
+
+ if (qcadev->susclk) {
+ err = clk_prepare_enable(qcadev->susclk);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+ }
+
+ qca_regulator_enable(qcadev);
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int qca_regulator_enable(struct qca_serdev *qcadev)
{
struct qca_power *power = qcadev->bt_power;
@@ -1523,6 +1541,15 @@ static int qca_serdev_probe(struct serdev_device *serdev)

qcadev->bt_power->vregs_on = false;

+ if (qcadev->btsoc_type == QCA_WCN3990 ||
+ qcadev->btsoc_type == QCA_WCN3991) {

There comes a point when using a switch statement is a lot easier to
read. See if that has been reached and if there are other places that
would benefit from a cleanup patch.


[Bala] : will work on this.

Regards

Marcel