[Patch v2 3/3] firmware: google: Probe for a GSMI handler in firmware

From: patrick . rudolph
Date: Mon Nov 18 2019 - 03:39:30 EST


From: Arthur Heymans <arthur@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Currently this driver is loaded if the DMI string matches coreboot
and has a proper smi_command in the ACPI FADT table, but a GSMI handler in
SMM is an optional feature in coreboot.

So probe for a SMM GSMI handler before initializing the driver.
If the smihandler leaves the calling argument in %eax in the SMM save state
untouched that generally means the is no handler for GSMI.

Signed-off-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/firmware/google/gsmi.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/google/gsmi.c b/drivers/firmware/google/gsmi.c
index 974c769b75cf..5b2011ebbe26 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/google/gsmi.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/google/gsmi.c
@@ -76,6 +76,7 @@
#define GSMI_CMD_LOG_S0IX_RESUME 0x0b
#define GSMI_CMD_CLEAR_CONFIG 0x20
#define GSMI_CMD_HANDSHAKE_TYPE 0xC1
+#define GSMI_CMD_RESERVED 0xff

/* Magic entry type for kernel events */
#define GSMI_LOG_ENTRY_TYPE_KERNEL 0xDEAD
@@ -746,6 +747,7 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(dmi, gsmi_dmi_table);
static __init int gsmi_system_valid(void)
{
u32 hash;
+ u16 cmd, result;

if (!dmi_check_system(gsmi_dmi_table))
return -ENODEV;
@@ -780,6 +782,23 @@ static __init int gsmi_system_valid(void)
return -ENODEV;
}

+ /* Test the smihandler with a bogus command. If it leaves the
+ * calling argument in %ax untouched, there is no handler for
+ * GSMI commands.
+ */
+ cmd = GSMI_CALLBACK | GSMI_CMD_RESERVED << 8;
+ asm volatile (
+ "outb %%al, %%dx\n\t"
+ : "=a" (result)
+ : "0" (cmd),
+ "d" (acpi_gbl_FADT.smi_command)
+ : "memory", "cc"
+ );
+ if (cmd == result) {
+ pr_info("gsmi: no gsmi handler in firmware\n");
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
+
/* Found */
return 0;
}
--
2.21.0