Re: [PATCH v2 06/10] iommu/vt-d: Fix off-by-one in PASID allocation

[Auger Eric]

Hi Jacob,

On 11/18/19 8:42 PM, Jacob Pan wrote:
> PASID allocator uses IDR which is exclusive for the end of the
> allocation range. There is no need to decrement pasid_max.
> 
> Fixes: af39507305fb ("iommu/vt-d: Apply global PASID in SVA")
> Reported-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/iommu/intel-svm.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel-svm.c b/drivers/iommu/intel-svm.c
> index 74df10a39dfc..e90d0b914afe 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel-svm.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel-svm.c
> @@ -338,7 +338,7 @@ int intel_svm_bind_mm(struct device *dev, int *pasid, int flags, struct svm_dev_
>  		/* Do not use PASID 0 in caching mode (virtualised IOMMU) */
>  		ret = intel_pasid_alloc_id(svm,
>  					   !!cap_caching_mode(iommu->cap),
> -					   pasid_max - 1, GFP_KERNEL);
> +					   pasid_max, GFP_KERNEL);
>  		if (ret < 0) {
>  			kfree(svm);
>  			kfree(sdev);
> 
Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks

Eric