[PATCH] of: property: Fix the semantics of of_is_ancestor_of()

From: Saravana Kannan
Date: Wed Nov 20 2019 - 03:02:43 EST


The of_is_ancestor_of() function was renamed from of_link_is_valid()
based on review feedback. The rename meant the semantics of the function
had to be inverted, but this was missed in the earlier patch.

So, fix the semantics of of_is_ancestor_of() and invert the conditional
expressions where it is used.

Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/of/property.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/of/property.c b/drivers/of/property.c
index dedbf82da838..0de1e7e69b6e 100644
--- a/drivers/of/property.c
+++ b/drivers/of/property.c
@@ -993,11 +993,11 @@ static bool of_is_ancestor_of(struct device_node *test_ancestor,
while (child) {
if (child == test_ancestor) {
of_node_put(child);
- return false;
+ return true;
}
child = of_get_next_parent(child);
}
- return true;
+ return false;
}

/**
@@ -1043,7 +1043,7 @@ static int of_link_to_phandle(struct device *dev, struct device_node *sup_np,
* descendant nodes. By definition, a child node can't be a functional
* dependency for the parent node.
*/
- if (!of_is_ancestor_of(dev->of_node, sup_np)) {
+ if (of_is_ancestor_of(dev->of_node, sup_np)) {
dev_dbg(dev, "Not linking to %pOFP - is descendant\n", sup_np);
of_node_put(sup_np);
return -EINVAL;
--
2.24.0.432.g9d3f5f5b63-goog