Re: [2/4] coccinelle: platform_get_irq: handle 2-statement branches

[Markus Elfring]

> Sorry, I seem to have done something quite wrong on this patch.

Interesting â


> I will fix it.

Thanks.

Development will be continued:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/11/19/1681
https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1156089/
https://lore.kernel.org/cocci/1574197705-31132-3-git-send-email-Julia.Lawall@xxxxxxx/


>> How do you think about to use the following SmPL code variant?
>
> And the benefit is what?
â
>> + ret =
>> +(platform_get_irq
>> +|platform_get_irq_byname
>> +)(E, ...);
>> +
>> + if ( \( ret < 0 \| ret <= 0 \) )
>> +-{
>> +-dev_err(...);
>> + S
>> +-}

* I suggest to use a different coding style for the specification of
  two function names in the SmPL disjunction.

* Would you like to avoid the mixing of code items in the first text column?

Regards,
Markus