Re: [PATCH 1/5] KVM: x86: fix presentation of TSX feature in ARCH_CAPABILITIES

From: Sean Christopherson
Date: Fri Nov 22 2019 - 15:15:40 EST


On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 07:17:43PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> KVM does not implement MSR_IA32_TSX_CTRL, so it must not be presented
> to the guests. It is also confusing to have !ARCH_CAP_TSX_CTRL_MSR &&
> !RTM && ARCH_CAP_TAA_NO: lack of MSR_IA32_TSX_CTRL suggests TSX was not
> hidden (it actually was), yet the value says that TSX is not vulnerable
> to microarchitectural data sampling. Fix both.
>
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 10 ++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index 5d530521f11d..6ea735d632e9 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -1327,12 +1327,18 @@ static u64 kvm_get_arch_capabilities(void)
> * If TSX is disabled on the system, guests are also mitigated against
> * TAA and clear CPU buffer mitigation is not required for guests.
> */
> - if (boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_TAA) && boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_RTM) &&
> - (data & ARCH_CAP_TSX_CTRL_MSR))
> + if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_RTM))
> + data &= ~ARCH_CAP_TAA_NO;
> + else if (!boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_TAA))
> + data |= ARCH_CAP_TAA_NO;
> + else if (data & ARCH_CAP_TSX_CTRL_MSR)
> data &= ~ARCH_CAP_MDS_NO;
>
> + /* KVM does not emulate MSR_IA32_TSX_CTRL. */
> + data &= ~ARCH_CAP_TSX_CTRL_MSR;
> return data;
> }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_get_arch_capabilities);

Whoever backports this patch should drop this spurious addition of
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL, unless they also want to backport the cleanup :-).