Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: Look for Kconfig indentation errors

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 at 17:35, Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2019-11-28 at 11:29 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > On Thu, 28 Nov 2019, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Kconfig should be indented with one tab for first level and tab+2 spaces
> > > for second level.  There are many mixups of this so add a checkpatch
> > > rule.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > I agree unifying the indentation is nice, and without something like
> > this it'll start bitrotting before Krzysztof's done fixing them all... I
> > think there's been quite a few fixes merged lately.
> >
> > I approve of the idea, but I'm clueless about the implementation.
>
> I think that a grammar, or a least an array of words
> that are supposed to start on a tab should be used here.

This won't work for wrong indentation of help text. This is quite
popular Kconfig indentation violation so worth checking. I can then
check for:
1. any white-space violations before array of Kconfig words - that
2. spaces mixed with tab before any text,
3. just spaces before any text,
4. tab + wrong number of spaces before any text.

It would look like:
+               if ($realfile =~ /Kconfig/ &&
+                   (($rawline =~
/^\+\s+(?:config|menuconfig|choice|endchoice|if|endif|menu|endmenu|source|bool|tristate|prompt|help|---help---|depends|select)\b/
&&
+                     $rawline !~ /^\+\t[a-z-]/) ||
+                    $rawline =~ /^\+\t* +\t+ *[a-zA-Z0-9-]/ ||
+                    $rawline =~ /^\+\t( |   )[a-zA-Z0-9-]/)) {

Best regards,
Krzysztof