Re: [PATCH 0/3] clk: let clock perform allocation in init

[Stephen Boyd]

Quoting Jerome Brunet (2019-11-29 07:36:28)
> 
> On Tue 24 Sep 2019 at 14:39, Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > This patchset is a follow up on this pinky swear [0].
> > Its purpose is:
> >  * Clarify the acceptable use of clk_ops init() callback
> >  * Let the init() callback return an error code in case anything
> >    fail.
> >  * Add the terminate() counter part of of init() to release the
> >    resources which may have been claimed in init()
> >
> > After discussing with Stephen at LPC, I decided to drop the 2 last patches
> > of the RFC [1]. I can live without it for now and nobody expressed a
> > critical need to get the proposed placeholder.
> >
> > [0]: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAEG3pNB-143Pr_xCTPj=tURhpiTiJqi61xfDGDVdU7zG5H-2tA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [1]: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190828102012.4493-1-jbrunet@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> 
> Hi Stephen,
> 
> Do you think we can fit this into the incoming cycle ?
> 

Sorry I missed this one. I'll apply it soon but won't be for this merge
window.