[PATCH 4.19 182/321] pwm: clps711x: Fix period calculation

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

From: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@xxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit b0f17570b8203c22f139459c86cfbaa0311313ed ]

Commit e39c0df1be5a ("pwm: Introduce the pwm_args concept") has
changed the variable for the period for clps711x-pwm driver, so now
pwm_get/set_period() works with pwm->state.period variable instead
of pwm->args.period.
This patch changes the period variable in other places where it is used.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/pwm/pwm-clps711x.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-clps711x.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-clps711x.c
index 26ec24e457b12..7e16b7def0dcb 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-clps711x.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-clps711x.c
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ static void clps711x_pwm_update_val(struct clps711x_chip *priv, u32 n, u32 v)
 static unsigned int clps711x_get_duty(struct pwm_device *pwm, unsigned int v)
 {
 	/* Duty cycle 0..15 max */
-	return DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(v * 0xf, pwm_get_period(pwm));
+	return DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(v * 0xf, pwm->args.period);
 }
 
 static int clps711x_pwm_request(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ static int clps711x_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
 	struct clps711x_chip *priv = to_clps711x_chip(chip);
 	unsigned int duty;
 
-	if (period_ns != pwm_get_period(pwm))
+	if (period_ns != pwm->args.period)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	duty = clps711x_get_duty(pwm, duty_ns);
-- 
2.20.1