Re: [PATCH v2] net: ethernet: ti: davinci_cpdma: fix warning "device driver frees DMA memory with different size"

From: Ivan Khoronzhuk
Date: Sat Dec 07 2019 - 07:02:58 EST


On Sat, Dec 07, 2019 at 01:44:20PM +0200, Ivan Khoronzhuk wrote:
On Thu, Dec 05, 2019 at 12:48:46PM +0200, Grygorii Strashko wrote:


On 04/12/2019 22:37, David Miller wrote:
From: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@xxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2019 18:50:29 +0200

@@ -1018,7 +1018,7 @@ static int cpdma_chan_submit_si(struct submit_info *si)
struct cpdma_chan *chan = si->chan;
struct cpdma_ctlr *ctlr = chan->ctlr;
int len = si->len;
- int swlen = len;
+ int swlen;
struct cpdma_desc __iomem *desc;
dma_addr_t buffer;
u32 mode;
@@ -1040,6 +1040,7 @@ static int cpdma_chan_submit_si(struct submit_info *si)
chan->stats.runt_transmit_buff++;
}
+ swlen = len;
mode = CPDMA_DESC_OWNER | CPDMA_DESC_SOP | CPDMA_DESC_EOP;
cpdma_desc_to_port(chan, mode, si->directed);
--
2.17.1


Now there is no reason to keep a separate swlen variable.

The integral value is always consumed as the length before the descriptor bits
are added to it.

Therefore you can just use 'len' everywhere in this function now.


Sry, but seems i can't, at least i can't just drop swlen.

Below in this function:
writel_relaxed(0, &desc->hw_next);
writel_relaxed(buffer, &desc->hw_buffer);
writel_relaxed(len, &desc->hw_len);
writel_relaxed(mode | len, &desc->hw_mode);
^^ here the "len" should be use

writel_relaxed((uintptr_t)si->token, &desc->sw_token);
writel_relaxed(buffer, &desc->sw_buffer);
writel_relaxed(swlen, &desc->sw_len);
^^ and here "len"|CPDMA_DMA_EXT_MAP if (si->data_dma) [1]

desc_read(desc, sw_len);

so additional if statement has to be added at [1] if "swlen" is dropped

--
Best regards,
grygorii

Seems like yes,

And the "swlen" can be avoided like this:

--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_cpdma.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_cpdma.c
@@ -1018,7 +1018,6 @@ static int cpdma_chan_submit_si(struct submit_info *si)
struct cpdma_chan *chan = si->chan;
struct cpdma_ctlr *ctlr = chan->ctlr;
int len = si->len;
- int swlen = len;
struct cpdma_desc __iomem *desc;
dma_addr_t buffer;
u32 mode;
@@ -1046,7 +1045,7 @@ static int cpdma_chan_submit_si(struct submit_info *si)
if (si->data_dma) {
buffer = si->data_dma;
dma_sync_single_for_device(ctlr->dev, buffer, len, chan->dir);
- swlen |= CPDMA_DMA_EXT_MAP;
+ writel_relaxed(len | CPDMA_DMA_EXT_MAP, &desc->sw_len);
} else {
buffer = dma_map_single(ctlr->dev, si->data_virt, len, chan->dir);
ret = dma_mapping_error(ctlr->dev, buffer);
@@ -1054,6 +1053,7 @@ static int cpdma_chan_submit_si(struct submit_info *si)
cpdma_desc_free(ctlr->pool, desc, 1);
return -EINVAL;
}
+ writel_relaxed(len, &desc->sw_len);
}

/* Relaxed IO accessors can be used here as there is read barrier
@@ -1065,7 +1065,6 @@ static int cpdma_chan_submit_si(struct submit_info *si)
writel_relaxed(mode | len, &desc->hw_mode);
writel_relaxed((uintptr_t)si->token, &desc->sw_token);
writel_relaxed(buffer, &desc->sw_buffer);
- writel_relaxed(swlen, &desc->sw_len);
desc_read(desc, sw_len);

__cpdma_chan_submit(chan, desc);

But not sure what is better.


Or like this:

--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_cpdma.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_cpdma.c
@@ -1018,7 +1018,6 @@ static int cpdma_chan_submit_si(struct submit_info *si)
struct cpdma_chan *chan = si->chan;
struct cpdma_ctlr *ctlr = chan->ctlr;
int len = si->len;
- int swlen = len;
struct cpdma_desc __iomem *desc;
dma_addr_t buffer;
u32 mode;
@@ -1046,7 +1045,6 @@ static int cpdma_chan_submit_si(struct submit_info *si)
if (si->data_dma) {
buffer = si->data_dma;
dma_sync_single_for_device(ctlr->dev, buffer, len, chan->dir);
- swlen |= CPDMA_DMA_EXT_MAP;
} else {
buffer = dma_map_single(ctlr->dev, si->data_virt, len, chan->dir);
ret = dma_mapping_error(ctlr->dev, buffer);
@@ -1065,7 +1063,7 @@ static int cpdma_chan_submit_si(struct submit_info *si)
writel_relaxed(mode | len, &desc->hw_mode);
writel_relaxed((uintptr_t)si->token, &desc->sw_token);
writel_relaxed(buffer, &desc->sw_buffer);
- writel_relaxed(swlen, &desc->sw_len);
+ writel_relaxed(si->data_dma ? len | CPDMA_DMA_EXT_MAP : len, &desc->sw_len);
desc_read(desc, sw_len);

__cpdma_chan_submit(chan, desc);

But it's branched twice then.

--
Regards,
Ivan Khoronzhuk