Re: linux-next: manual merge of the selinux tree with the keys tree

[Paul Moore]

On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 6:50 PM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the selinux tree got a conflict in:
>
>   include/linux/lsm_audit.h
>
> between commit:
>
>   59336b0f8000 ("smack: Implement the watch_key and post_notification hooks")
>
> from the keys tree and commit:
>
>   59438b46471a ("security,lockdown,selinux: implement SELinux lockdown")
>
> from the selinux tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
>
> diff --cc include/linux/lsm_audit.h
> index 734d67889826,99d629fd9944..000000000000
> --- a/include/linux/lsm_audit.h
> +++ b/include/linux/lsm_audit.h
> @@@ -74,7 -74,7 +74,8 @@@ struct common_audit_data
>   #define LSM_AUDIT_DATA_FILE   12
>   #define LSM_AUDIT_DATA_IBPKEY 13
>   #define LSM_AUDIT_DATA_IBENDPORT 14
>  -#define LSM_AUDIT_DATA_LOCKDOWN 15
>  +#define LSM_AUDIT_DATA_NOTIFICATION 15
> ++#define LSM_AUDIT_DATA_LOCKDOWN 16
>         union   {
>                 struct path path;
>                 struct dentry *dentry;

That should be fine, thanks.

-- 
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com