Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf/x86/intel/bts: Fix the use of page_private()

From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Tue Dec 10 2019 - 10:35:50 EST


On Thu, Dec 05, 2019 at 05:28:53PM +0300, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
> Commit
>
> 8062382c8dbe2 ("perf/x86/intel/bts: Add BTS PMU driver")
>
> uses page_private(page) without checking the PagePrivate(page) first,

Well, arguably it did check it, but you didn't like that WARN ;-)

> which seems like a potential bug, considering that page->private aliases
> with other stuff in struct page.
>
> Fix this by checking PagePrivate() first.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Fixes: 8062382c8dbe2 ("perf/x86/intel/bts: Add BTS PMU driver")
> ---
> arch/x86/events/intel/bts.c | 14 +++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/bts.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/bts.c
> index d53b4fb86d87..9e4da1c5a129 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/bts.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/bts.c
> @@ -63,9 +63,17 @@ struct bts_buffer {
>
> static struct pmu bts_pmu;
>
> +static int buf_nr_pages(struct page *page)
> +{
> + if (!PagePrivate(page))
> + return 1;
> +
> + return 1 << page_private(page);
> +}

Yes, that seems like a sensible helper.