Re: [PATCH bpf v2] bpftool: Don't crash on missing jited insns or ksyms

[Toke HÃiland-JÃrgensen]

Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Tue, 10 Dec 2019 19:14:12 +0100, Toke HÃiland-JÃrgensen wrote:
>> When the kptr_restrict sysctl is set, the kernel can fail to return
>> jited_ksyms or jited_prog_insns, but still have positive values in
>> nr_jited_ksyms and jited_prog_len. This causes bpftool to crash when trying
>> to dump the program because it only checks the len fields not the actual
>> pointers to the instructions and ksyms.
>> 
>> Fix this by adding the missing checks.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Toke HÃiland-JÃrgensen <toke@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Fixes: 71bb428fe2c1 ("tools: bpf: add bpftool")
>
> and
>
> Fixes: f84192ee00b7 ("tools: bpftool: resolve calls without using imm field")
>
> ?

Yeah, guess so? Although I must admit it's not quite clear to me whether
bpftool gets stable backports, or if it follows the "only moving
forward" credo of libbpf?

Anyhow, I don't suppose it'll hurt to have the Fixes: tag(s) in there;
does Patchwork pick these up (or can you guys do that when you apply
this?), or should I resend?

-Toke