Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] brcmfmac: add support for BCM4359 SDIO chipset

[Soeren Moch]

On 12.12.19 10:42, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Soeren Moch <smoch@xxxxxx> writes:
>
>> Add support for the BCM4359 chipset with SDIO interface and RSDB support
>> to the brcmfmac wireless network driver in patches 1-7.
>>
>> Enhance devicetree of the RockPro64 arm64/rockchip board to use an
>> AP6359SA based wifi/bt combo module with this chipset in patches 8-9.
>>
>>
>> Chung-Hsien Hsu (1):
>>   brcmfmac: set F2 blocksize and watermark for 4359
>>
>> Soeren Moch (5):
>>   brcmfmac: fix rambase for 4359/9
>>   brcmfmac: make errors when setting roaming parameters non-fatal
>>   brcmfmac: add support for BCM4359 SDIO chipset
>>   arm64: dts: rockchip: RockPro64: enable wifi module at sdio0
>>   arm64: dts: rockchip: RockPro64: hook up bluetooth at uart0
>>
>> Wright Feng (3):
>>   brcmfmac: reset two D11 cores if chip has two D11 cores
>>   brcmfmac: add RSDB condition when setting interface combinations
>>   brcmfmac: not set mbss in vif if firmware does not support MBSS
>>
>>  .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rockpro64.dts    | 50 +++++++++++---
>>  .../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c      |  8 ++-
>>  .../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/cfg80211.c    | 68 +++++++++++++++----
>>  .../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/chip.c        | 54 ++++++++++++++-
>>  .../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/chip.h        |  1 +
>>  .../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/pcie.c        |  2 +-
>>  .../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c        | 17 +++++
>>  include/linux/mmc/sdio_ids.h                  |  2 +
>>  8 files changed, 176 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> Just to make sure we are on the same page, I will apply patches 1-7 to
> wireless-drivers-next and patches 8-9 go to some other tree? And there
> are no dependencies between the brcmfmac patches and dts patches?
>
Yes, this also is my understanding. I'm glad if you are fine with
patches 1-7.
Heiko will pick up patches 8-9 later for linux-rockchip independently.
And if we need another round of review for patches 8-9, I think we don't
need to bother linux-wireless with this.

Thanks,
Soeren