Re: [PATCH] powerpc/irq: don't use current_stack_pointer() in do_IRQ()

From: Christoph Hellwig
Date: Thu Dec 12 2019 - 07:51:47 EST

Next message: Andrew Murray: "Re: [PATCH] Documentation: PCI: msi-howto.rst: Fix wrong function name"
Previous message: Heikki Krogerus: "Re: [PATCH] usb: typec: fusb302: Fix an undefined reference to 'extcon_get_state'"
In reply to: Christophe Leroy: "[PATCH] powerpc/irq: don't use current_stack_pointer() in do_IRQ()"
Next in thread: Christophe Leroy: "Re: [PATCH] powerpc/irq: don't use current_stack_pointer() in do_IRQ()"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Why can't current_stack_pointer be turned into an inline function using
inline assembly? That would reduce the overhead for all callers.

Next message: Andrew Murray: "Re: [PATCH] Documentation: PCI: msi-howto.rst: Fix wrong function name"
Previous message: Heikki Krogerus: "Re: [PATCH] usb: typec: fusb302: Fix an undefined reference to 'extcon_get_state'"
In reply to: Christophe Leroy: "[PATCH] powerpc/irq: don't use current_stack_pointer() in do_IRQ()"
Next in thread: Christophe Leroy: "Re: [PATCH] powerpc/irq: don't use current_stack_pointer() in do_IRQ()"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]