Re: [RFC] btf: Some structs are doubled because of struct ring_buffer

[Steven Rostedt]

On Fri, 13 Dec 2019 19:46:21 +0100
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> >   perf_buffer and trace_buffer ?  
> 
> That's what I just proposed, right? So ACK on that ;-)

Anyway, here's v2, followed by the tracing one, which has the diffstat
of:

 drivers/oprofile/cpu_buffer.c        |   2 +-
 include/linux/ring_buffer.h          | 110 ++++++++++++------------
 include/linux/trace_events.h         |   4 +-
 include/trace/trace_events.h         |   2 +-
 kernel/trace/blktrace.c              |   4 +-
 kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c           | 124 +++++++++++++--------------
 kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c |   2 +-
 kernel/trace/trace.c                 |  70 +++++++--------
 kernel/trace/trace.h                 |  22 ++---
 kernel/trace/trace_branch.c          |   2 +-
 kernel/trace/trace_events.c          |   2 +-
 kernel/trace/trace_events_hist.c     |   2 +-
 kernel/trace/trace_functions_graph.c |   4 +-
 kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c           |   2 +-
 kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c          |   4 +-
 kernel/trace/trace_mmiotrace.c       |   4 +-
 kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c    |   4 +-
 kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c        |   4 +-
 kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c          |   2 +-
 19 files changed, 185 insertions(+), 185 deletions(-)


-- Steve