Actually, why are you not using module namespaces here for this new
code? That would help you out a lot.
I must admit I don't understand the question. This is literally modeled
after is_gb_host_device(), did I miss something in the Greybus
implementation?
No, I mean the new MODULE_NAMESPACE() support that is in the kernel.
I'll move the greybus code to use it too, but when you are adding new
apis, it just makes sense to use it then as well.