Re: [PATCH] platform/chrome: cros_ec_lpc: Use platform_get_irq_optional() for optional IRQs

From: Enric Balletbo i Serra
Date: Sat Dec 14 2019 - 06:57:23 EST


Hi,

On 29/11/19 16:56, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 2:23 AM Enric Balletbo i Serra
> <enric.balletbo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> As platform_get_irq() now prints an error when the interrupt does not
>> exist, use platform_get_irq_optional() to get the IRQ which is optional
>> to avoid below error message during probe:
>>
>> [ 5.113502] cros_ec_lpcs GOOG0004:00: IRQ index 0 not found
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <groeck@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>

Queued for 5.6.

>> ---
>>
>> drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_lpc.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_lpc.c b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_lpc.c
>> index dccf479c6625..ffdea7c347f2 100644
>> --- a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_lpc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_lpc.c
>> @@ -396,7 +396,7 @@ static int cros_ec_lpc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> * Some boards do not have an IRQ allotted for cros_ec_lpc,
>> * which makes ENXIO an expected (and safe) scenario.
>> */
>> - irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
>> + irq = platform_get_irq_optional(pdev, 0);
>> if (irq > 0)
>> ec_dev->irq = irq;
>> else if (irq != -ENXIO) {
>> --
>> 2.20.1
>>
>