Re: [PATCH 1/2] scsi: ufs: Put SCSI host after remove it

[Bart Van Assche]

On 2019-12-14 14:24, cang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> How do you think if I replace my patch with below one?
> In this way, you can also move blk_cleanup_queue() behind
> cancel_work_sync(eh_work).
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> index b5966fa..bd4ae75 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> @@ -8251,15 +8251,17 @@ void ufshcd_remove(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ ufs_bsg_remove(hba);
> ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ ufs_sysfs_remove_nodes(hba->dev);
> ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ scsi_remove_host(hba->host);
> -ÂÂÂÂÂÂ /* disable interrupts */
> -ÂÂÂÂÂÂ ufshcd_disable_intr(hba, hba->intr_mask);
> -ÂÂÂÂÂÂ ufshcd_hba_stop(hba, true);
> -
> ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ ufshcd_exit_clk_scaling(hba);
> ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ ufshcd_exit_clk_gating(hba);
> ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ if (ufshcd_is_clkscaling_supported(hba))
> ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ device_remove_file(hba->dev,
> &hba->clk_scaling.enable_attr);
> +ÂÂÂÂÂÂ cancel_work_sync(&hba->eeh_work);
> +ÂÂÂÂÂÂ cancel_work_sync(&hba->eh_work);
> +ÂÂÂÂÂÂ /* disable interrupts */
> +ÂÂÂÂÂÂ ufshcd_disable_intr(hba, hba->intr_mask);
> +ÂÂÂÂÂÂ ufshcd_hba_stop(hba, true);
> ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ ufshcd_hba_exit(hba);
> +ÂÂÂÂÂÂ ufshcd_dealloc_host(hba);
> Â}
> ÂEXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ufshcd_remove);

Hi Can,

To which kernel tree does the above patch apply? I'm asking this because
I don't see the recently added blk_cleanup_queue() calls in the above
patch. Please start from Martin's latest scsi-queue branch when
preparing SCSI patches.

Additionally, is it on purpose that there is no scsi_host_put() call in
the above code? I'd like to keep that call because without that call a
memory leak will occur when unloading the ufshcd-core kernel driver.

Thanks,

Bart.