Re: [PATCH 1/2] scsi: ufs: Put SCSI host after remove it

From: Bart Van Assche
Date: Sun Dec 15 2019 - 21:42:43 EST

On 2019-12-15 17:34, cang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> This is applied to 5.5/scsi-queue. The two changes I patsed from you are
> not merged yet, I am still doing code review to them, so there is no
> blk_cleanup_queue() calls in my code base. I am just saying you may move
> your blk_cleanup_queue() calls below cancel_work_sync(&hba->eh_work) if
> my change applies. How do you think?
> scsi_host_put() was there before but explicitly removed by
> afa3dfd42d205b106787476647735aa1de1a5d02. I agree with you, without this
> change, there is memory leak.

Hi Can,

Since your patch restores a call that was removed earlier, please
consider adding a Fixes: tag to your patch.

Please also have a look at
As one can see my patches that introduce blk_cleanup_queue() and
blk_mq_free_tag_set() calls have already been queued on Martin's
5.6/scsi-queue branch.