Re: [PATCH v2 3/9] thunderbolt: Populate PG field in hot plug acknowledgment packet
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Tue Dec 17 2019 - 07:46:31 EST
On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 03:33:39PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> USB4 1.0 section 6.4.2.7 specifies a new field (PG) in notification
> packet that is sent as response of hot plug/unplug events. This field
> tells whether the acknowledgment is for plug or unplug event. This needs
> to be set accordingly in order the router to send further hot plug
> notifications.
>
> To make it simpler we fill the field unconditionally. Legacy devices do
> not look at this field so there should be no problems with them.
>
> While there rename tb_cfg_error() to tb_cfg_ack_plug() and update the
> log message accordingly. The function is only used to ack plug/unplug
> events.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/thunderbolt/ctl.c | 19 +++++++++++++------
> drivers/thunderbolt/ctl.h | 3 +--
> drivers/thunderbolt/tb.c | 3 +--
> drivers/thunderbolt/tb_msgs.h | 6 +++++-
> 4 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thunderbolt/ctl.c b/drivers/thunderbolt/ctl.c
> index d97813e80e5f..f77ceae5c7d7 100644
> --- a/drivers/thunderbolt/ctl.c
> +++ b/drivers/thunderbolt/ctl.c
> @@ -708,19 +708,26 @@ void tb_ctl_stop(struct tb_ctl *ctl)
> /* public interface, commands */
>
> /**
> - * tb_cfg_error() - send error packet
> + * tb_cfg_ack_plug() - Ack hot plug/unplug event
> + * @ctl: Control channel to use
> + * @route: Router that originated the event
> + * @port: Port where the hot plug/unplug happened
> + * @unplug: Ack hot plug or unplug
> *
> - * Return: Returns 0 on success or an error code on failure.
> + * Call this as response for hot plug/unplug event to ack it.
> + * Returns %0 on success or an error code on failure.
> */
> -int tb_cfg_error(struct tb_ctl *ctl, u64 route, u32 port,
> - enum tb_cfg_error error)
> +int tb_cfg_ack_plug(struct tb_ctl *ctl, u64 route, u32 port, bool unplug)
> {
> struct cfg_error_pkg pkg = {
> .header = tb_cfg_make_header(route),
> .port = port,
> - .error = error,
> + .error = TB_CFG_ERROR_ACK_PLUG_EVENT,
> + .pg = unplug ? TB_CFG_ERROR_PG_HOT_UNPLUG
> + : TB_CFG_ERROR_PG_HOT_PLUG,
> };
> - tb_ctl_dbg(ctl, "resetting error on %llx:%x.\n", route, port);
> + tb_ctl_dbg(ctl, "acking hot %splug event on %llx:%x\n",
> + unplug ? "un" : "", route, port);
> return tb_ctl_tx(ctl, &pkg, sizeof(pkg), TB_CFG_PKG_ERROR);
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thunderbolt/ctl.h b/drivers/thunderbolt/ctl.h
> index 2f1a1e111110..97cb03b38953 100644
> --- a/drivers/thunderbolt/ctl.h
> +++ b/drivers/thunderbolt/ctl.h
> @@ -123,8 +123,7 @@ static inline struct tb_cfg_header tb_cfg_make_header(u64 route)
> return header;
> }
>
> -int tb_cfg_error(struct tb_ctl *ctl, u64 route, u32 port,
> - enum tb_cfg_error error);
> +int tb_cfg_ack_plug(struct tb_ctl *ctl, u64 route, u32 port, bool unplug);
> struct tb_cfg_result tb_cfg_reset(struct tb_ctl *ctl, u64 route,
> int timeout_msec);
> struct tb_cfg_result tb_cfg_read_raw(struct tb_ctl *ctl, void *buffer,
> diff --git a/drivers/thunderbolt/tb.c b/drivers/thunderbolt/tb.c
> index 54085f67810a..e54d0d89a32d 100644
> --- a/drivers/thunderbolt/tb.c
> +++ b/drivers/thunderbolt/tb.c
> @@ -768,8 +768,7 @@ static void tb_handle_event(struct tb *tb, enum tb_cfg_pkg_type type,
>
> route = tb_cfg_get_route(&pkg->header);
>
> - if (tb_cfg_error(tb->ctl, route, pkg->port,
> - TB_CFG_ERROR_ACK_PLUG_EVENT)) {
> + if (tb_cfg_ack_plug(tb->ctl, route, pkg->port, pkg->unplug)) {
> tb_warn(tb, "could not ack plug event on %llx:%x\n", route,
> pkg->port);
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/thunderbolt/tb_msgs.h b/drivers/thunderbolt/tb_msgs.h
> index 3705057723b6..fc208c567953 100644
> --- a/drivers/thunderbolt/tb_msgs.h
> +++ b/drivers/thunderbolt/tb_msgs.h
> @@ -67,9 +67,13 @@ struct cfg_error_pkg {
> u32 zero1:4;
> u32 port:6;
> u32 zero2:2; /* Both should be zero, still they are different fields. */
> - u32 zero3:16;
> + u32 zero3:14;
> + u32 pg:2;
> } __packed;
Meta-comment, how does this work for endian issues? gcc will "always"
pack these in the correct way such that they match up to the bits on the
wire?
thanks,
greg k-h