Re: [PATCH 2/2] leds: lm3692x: Allow to set ovp and brigthness mode

[Guido Günther]

Hi Dan,
On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 06:53:45AM -0600, Dan Murphy wrote:
> Guido
> 
> On 12/16/19 6:28 AM, Guido Günther wrote:
> > Overvoltage protection and brightness mode are currently hardcoded
> > as disabled in the driver. Make these configurable via DT.
> 
> Can we split these up to two separate patch series?

Sure, should the binding doc updates be split as well?

> We are adding 2 separate features and if something is incorrect with one of
> the changes it is a bit hard to debug.
> 
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Guido Günther <agx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >   drivers/leds/leds-lm3692x.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> >   1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/leds/leds-lm3692x.c b/drivers/leds/leds-lm3692x.c
> > index 8b408102e138..2c084b333628 100644
> > --- a/drivers/leds/leds-lm3692x.c
> > +++ b/drivers/leds/leds-lm3692x.c
> > @@ -114,6 +114,7 @@ struct lm3692x_led {
> >   	struct regulator *regulator;
> >   	int led_enable;
> >   	int model_id;
> > +	u8 boost_ctrl, brightness_ctrl;
> >   };
> >   static const struct reg_default lm3692x_reg_defs[] = {
> > @@ -249,10 +250,7 @@ static int lm3692x_init(struct lm3692x_led *led)
> >   	if (ret)
> >   		goto out;
> > -	ret = regmap_write(led->regmap, LM3692X_BOOST_CTRL,
> > -			LM3692X_BOOST_SW_1MHZ |
> > -			LM3692X_BOOST_SW_NO_SHIFT |
> > -			LM3692X_OCP_PROT_1_5A);
> > +	ret = regmap_write(led->regmap, LM3692X_BOOST_CTRL, led->boost_ctrl);
> >   	if (ret)
> >   		goto out;
> 
> regmap_update_bits
> 
> 
> > @@ -268,8 +266,7 @@ static int lm3692x_init(struct lm3692x_led *led)
> >   	if (ret)
> >   		goto out;
> > -	ret = regmap_write(led->regmap, LM3692X_BRT_CTRL,
> > -			LM3692X_BL_ADJ_POL | LM3692X_RAMP_EN);
> > +	ret = regmap_write(led->regmap, LM3692X_BRT_CTRL, led->brightness_ctrl);
> >   	if (ret)
> >   		goto out;
> regmap_update_bits
> > @@ -326,6 +323,8 @@ static int lm3692x_probe_dt(struct lm3692x_led *led)
> >   {
> >   	struct fwnode_handle *child = NULL;
> >   	struct led_init_data init_data = {};
> > +	u32 ovp = 0;
> > +	bool exp_mode;
> >   	int ret;
> >   	led->enable_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_optional(&led->client->dev,
> > @@ -350,6 +349,38 @@ static int lm3692x_probe_dt(struct lm3692x_led *led)
> >   		led->regulator = NULL;
> >   	}
> > +	led->boost_ctrl = LM3692X_BOOST_SW_1MHZ |
> > +		LM3692X_BOOST_SW_NO_SHIFT |
> > +		LM3692X_OCP_PROT_1_5A;
> Make this a #define and then it can be reused as a mask for
> regmap_update_bits
> > +	ret = device_property_read_u32(&led->client->dev,
> > +				       "ti,overvoltage-volts", &ovp);
> > +	if (!ret) {
> 
> if (ret)
> 
>     set boost_ctrl to default value since the default is not 0
> 
> led->boost_ctrl |= LM3692X_OVP_29V;
> 
> else
> 
>      do case
> 
> > +		switch (ovp) {
> > +		case 0:
> > +			break;
> > +		case 22:
> If the value is 21v why is this case 22?  DT binding says 21 is the first
> value
> > +			led->boost_ctrl |= LM3692X_OVP_21V;
> > +			break;
> > +		case 25:
> > +			led->boost_ctrl |= LM3692X_OVP_25V;
> > +			break;
> > +		case 29:
> > +			led->boost_ctrl |= LM3692X_OVP_29V;
> > +			break;
> > +		default:
> > +			dev_err(&led->client->dev, "Invalid OVP %d\n", ovp);
> > +			return -EINVAL;
> > +		}
> > +	}
> > +	dev_dbg(&led->client->dev, "OVP: %dV", ovp);
> > +
> extra debug statement
> > +	led->brightness_ctrl = LM3692X_BL_ADJ_POL | LM3692X_RAMP_EN;
> Same comment as before on the #define
> > +	exp_mode = device_property_read_bool(&led->client->dev,
> > +				     "ti,brightness-mapping-exponential");
> > +	dev_dbg(&led->client->dev, "Exponential brightness: %d", exp_mode);
> 
> extra debug statement

They're not extra but meant to ease debugging the driver long therm but
i can drop these if that's not wanted. The rest makes a lot of sense.
Thanks a lot for having a look so promptly!

Cheers,
 -- Guido

> 
> Dan
> 
>