Re: [PATCH RFC 04/15] KVM: Implement ring-based dirty memory tracking

[Paolo Bonzini]

On 17/12/19 16:38, Peter Xu wrote:
> There's still time to persuade me to going back to it. :)
> 
> (Though, yes I still like current solution... if we can get rid of the
>  only kvmgt ugliness, we can even throw away the per-vm ring with its
>  "extra" 4k page.  Then I suppose it'll be even harder to persuade me :)

Actually that's what convinced me in the first place, so let's
absolutely get rid of both the per-VM ring and the union.  Kevin and
Alex have answered and everybody seems to agree.

Paolo