Re: [PATCH 2/9] PM / devfreq: Remove devfreq_get_devfreq_by_phandle function

From: Chanwoo Choi
Date: Tue Dec 17 2019 - 22:31:57 EST


On 12/18/19 11:59 AM, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> On 12/17/19 11:33 PM, Leonard Crestez wrote:
>> On 17.12.2019 07:51, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>>> Previously, devfreq core support 'devfreq' property in order to get
>>> the devfreq device by phandle. But, 'devfreq' property name is not proper
>>> on devicetree binding because this name doesn't mean the any h/w attribute.
>>>
>>> The devfreq core hand over the right to decide the property name
>>> for getting the devfreq device on devicetree. Each devfreq driver
>>> will decide the property name on devicetree binding and then get
>>> the devfreq device by using devfreq_get_devfreq_by_node().
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c | 35 -----------------------------------
>>> drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
>>> include/linux/devfreq.h | 8 --------
>>> 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c b/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
>>> index cb8ca81c8973..c3d3c7c802a0 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
>>> @@ -991,48 +991,13 @@ struct devfreq *devfreq_get_devfreq_by_node(struct device_node *node)
>>>
>>> return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>>> }
>>> -
>>> -/*
>>> - * devfreq_get_devfreq_by_phandle - Get the devfreq device from devicetree
>>> - * @dev - instance to the given device
>>> - * @index - index into list of devfreq
>>> - *
>>> - * return the instance of devfreq device
>>> - */
>>> -struct devfreq *devfreq_get_devfreq_by_phandle(struct device *dev, int index)
>>> -{
>>> - struct device_node *node;
>>> - struct devfreq *devfreq;
>>> -
>>> - if (!dev)
>>> - return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>>> -
>>> - if (!dev->of_node)
>>> - return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>>> -
>>> - node = of_parse_phandle(dev->of_node, "devfreq", index);
>>> - if (!node)
>>> - return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>>> -
>>> - devfreq = devfreq_get_devfreq_by_node(node);
>>> - of_node_put(node);
>>> -
>>> - return devfreq;
>>> -}
>>> -
>>> #else
>>> struct devfreq *devfreq_get_devfreq_by_node(struct device_node *node)
>>> {
>>> return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>>> }
>>> -
>>> -struct devfreq *devfreq_get_devfreq_by_phandle(struct device *dev, int index)
>>> -{
>>> - return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>>> -}
>>> #endif /* CONFIG_OF */
>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devfreq_get_devfreq_by_node);
>>> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devfreq_get_devfreq_by_phandle);
>>>
>>> /**
>>> * devm_devfreq_remove_device() - Resource-managed devfreq_remove_device()
>>> diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c b/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c
>>> index 7f5917d59072..9aac2db956d5 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c
>>> @@ -146,6 +146,16 @@ static int exynos_bus_get_dev_status(struct device *dev,
>>> return ret;
>>> }
>>>
>>> +static struct devfreq *get_parent_devfreq_by_node(struct device_node *np)
>>> +{
>>> + struct device_node *node = of_parse_phandle(np, "devfreq", 0);
>>> +
>>> + if (!node)
>>> + return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>>> +
>>> + return devfreq_get_devfreq_by_node(node);
>>> +}
>>
>> The _by_node suffix here is confusing because it actually fetches a
>> property of the node unlike devfreq_get_devfreq_by_node. Maybe call this
>> get_parent_devfreq_from_node?
>>
>> Since it's a static function it could just be called get_parent_devfreq?
>
> OK.

I'll rename as following because all functions of exynos-bus.c
which used 'exynos_bus_' prefix.
- exynos_bus_get_parent_devfreq()

>
>>
>>> +
>>> static void exynos_bus_exit(struct device *dev)
>>> {
>>> struct exynos_bus *bus = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>>> @@ -353,8 +363,8 @@ static int exynos_bus_profile_init_passive(struct exynos_bus *bus,
>>> profile->exit = exynos_bus_passive_exit;
>>>
>>> /* Get the instance of parent devfreq device */
>>> - parent_devfreq = devfreq_get_devfreq_by_phandle(dev, 0);
>>> - if (IS_ERR(parent_devfreq))
>>> + parent_devfreq = get_parent_devfreq_by_node(dev->of_node);
>>> + if (IS_ERR(parent_devfreq)) {
>>> return -EPROBE_DEFER;
>>>
>>> passive_data = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*passive_data), GFP_KERNEL);
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/devfreq.h b/include/linux/devfreq.h
>>> index e3633ae43349..3ed96426302e 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/devfreq.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/devfreq.h
>>> @@ -254,8 +254,6 @@ extern void devm_devfreq_unregister_notifier(struct device *dev,
>>> struct notifier_block *nb,
>>> unsigned int list);
>>> extern struct devfreq *devfreq_get_devfreq_by_node(struct device_node *node);
>>> -extern struct devfreq *devfreq_get_devfreq_by_phandle(struct device *dev,
>>> - int index);
>>>
>>> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEVFREQ_GOV_SIMPLE_ONDEMAND)
>>> /**
>>> @@ -413,12 +411,6 @@ struct devfreq *devfreq_get_devfreq_by_node(struct device_node *node)
>>> return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>>> }
>>>
>>> -static inline struct devfreq *devfreq_get_devfreq_by_phandle(struct device *dev,
>>> - int index)
>>> -{
>>> - return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>>> -}
>>> -
>>> static inline int devfreq_update_stats(struct devfreq *df)
>>> {
>>> return -EINVAL;
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>


--
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
Samsung Electronics