Re: [<PATCH v1> 6/9] mmc: sdhci-msm: Ignore data timeout error for R1B commands

From: Greg KH
Date: Wed Dec 18 2019 - 03:34:12 EST


On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 06:50:39PM -0800, Bao D. Nguyen wrote:
> From: Sahitya Tummala <stummala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Ignore data timeout error for R1B commands as there will be no
> data associated and the busy timeout value for these commands
> could be lager than the maximum timeout value that controller
> can handle.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sahitya Tummala <stummala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Bao D. Nguyen <nguyenb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c | 15 +++++++++------
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h | 7 +++++++
> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> index c04e1ac..0a05d74 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> @@ -2925,12 +2925,6 @@ static void sdhci_data_irq(struct sdhci_host *host, u32 intmask)
> * above in sdhci_cmd_irq().
> */
> if (data_cmd && (data_cmd->flags & MMC_RSP_BUSY)) {
> - if (intmask & SDHCI_INT_DATA_TIMEOUT) {
> - host->data_cmd = NULL;
> - data_cmd->error = -ETIMEDOUT;
> - __sdhci_finish_mrq(host, data_cmd->mrq);
> - return;
> - }
> if (intmask & SDHCI_INT_DATA_END) {
> host->data_cmd = NULL;
> /*
> @@ -2944,6 +2938,15 @@ static void sdhci_data_irq(struct sdhci_host *host, u32 intmask)
> __sdhci_finish_mrq(host, data_cmd->mrq);
> return;
> }
> + if (host->quirks2 &
> + SDHCI_QUIRK2_IGNORE_DATATOUT_FOR_R1BCMD)
> + return;
> + if (intmask & SDHCI_INT_DATA_TIMEOUT) {
> + host->data_cmd = NULL;
> + data_cmd->error = -ETIMEDOUT;
> + __sdhci_finish_mrq(host, data_cmd->mrq);
> + return;
> + }
> }
>
> /*
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h
> index 0ed3e0e..1a88f74 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h
> @@ -482,6 +482,13 @@ struct sdhci_host {
> * block count.
> */
> #define SDHCI_QUIRK2_USE_32BIT_BLK_CNT (1<<18)
> +/*
> + * Ignore data timeout error for R1B commands as there will be no
> + * data associated and the busy timeout value for these commands
> + * could be lager than the maximum timeout value that controller
> + * can handle.
> + */
> +#define SDHCI_QUIRK2_IGNORE_DATATOUT_FOR_R1BCMD (1<<19)

No tabs?

And what about using BIT(19) instead?

thanks,

greg k-h