Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with the tip tree

[Paul E. McKenney]

On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 05:27:26PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 11:50:35AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > Today's linux-next merge of the rcu tree got a conflict in:
> > 
> >   kernel/cpu.c
> > 
> > between commit:
> > 
> >   45178ac0cea8 ("cpu/hotplug, stop_machine: Fix stop_machine vs hotplug order")
> > 
> > from the tip tree and commit:
> > 
> >   d62c673f4cfc ("cpu/hotplug, stop_machine: Fix stop_machine vs hotplug order")
> > 
> > from the rcu tree.
> > 
> > I fixed it up (I just used the tip tree version) and can carry the fix
> > as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but
> > any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
> > when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider
> > cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
> > particularly complex conflicts.
> 
> I will pull this one out of the set that I mark for -next.  That way
> I can test and you can avoid at least this one conflict.  ;-)

Heh.  And the reason that it conflicts is that I fixed at least one
spelling error...  ;-)

Still, the one in tip is the official one, so I will proceed as planned.

							Thanx, Paul