Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] sched/fair: Task placement biasing using uclamp

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 04:06:38PM +0100, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
> On 11/12/2019 12:38, Valentin Schneider wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > While uclamp restrictions currently only impact schedutil's frequency
> > selection, it would make sense to also let them impact CPU selection in
> > asymmetric topologies. This would let us steer specific tasks towards
> > certain CPU capacities regardless of their actual utilization - I give a
> > few examples in patch 4.
> > 
> > The first three patches are mainly cleanups, the meat of the thing is
> > in patches 4 and 5.
> > 
> > Note that this is in the same spirit as what Patrick had proposed for EAS
> > on Android [1]
> > 
> > [1]: https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/common/+/b61876ed122f816660fe49e0de1b7ee4891deaa2%5E%21
> 
> Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@xxxxxxx>
> Tested-By: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@xxxxxxx>

Thanks!