Re: [PATCH] iio: adc: stm32-dfsdm: Use dma_request_chan() instead dma_request_slave_channel()

From: Jonathan Cameron
Date: Mon Dec 23 2019 - 10:45:44 EST


On Tue, 17 Dec 2019 09:52:21 +0200
Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@xxxxxx> wrote:

> dma_request_slave_channel() is a wrapper on top of dma_request_chan()
> eating up the error code.
>
> By using dma_request_chan() directly the driver can support deferred
> probing against DMA.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@xxxxxx>
I don't think this one goes far enough.

One of the paths does:

/* Optionally request DMA */
if (stm32_dfsdm_dma_request(indio_dev)) {
dev_dbg(&indio_dev->dev, "No DMA support\n");
return 0;
}

That needs specific handling for deferred probing.

> ---
> drivers/iio/adc/stm32-dfsdm-adc.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-dfsdm-adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-dfsdm-adc.c
> index e493242c266e..3aac1a21f9d0 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-dfsdm-adc.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-dfsdm-adc.c
> @@ -1383,9 +1383,9 @@ static int stm32_dfsdm_dma_request(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> {
> struct stm32_dfsdm_adc *adc = iio_priv(indio_dev);
>
> - adc->dma_chan = dma_request_slave_channel(&indio_dev->dev, "rx");
> - if (!adc->dma_chan)
> - return -EINVAL;
> + adc->dma_chan = dma_request_chan(&indio_dev->dev, "rx");
> + if (IS_ERR(adc->dma_chan))
> + return PTR_ERR(adc->dma_chan);
>
> adc->rx_buf = dma_alloc_coherent(adc->dma_chan->device->dev,
> DFSDM_DMA_BUFFER_SIZE,