Re: [PATCH] x86/boot/compressed/64: Define __force_order only when CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE is unset

From: Kirill A. Shutemov
Date: Mon Dec 23 2019 - 12:10:45 EST

Next message: Kai-Heng Feng: "[PATCH v2] drm/i915: Re-init lspcon after HPD if lspcon probe failed"
Previous message: Paolo Bonzini: "Re: [RESEND RFC 0/2] Paravirtualized Control Register pinning"
In reply to: Khem Raj: "[PATCH] x86/boot/compressed/64: Define __force_order only when CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE is unset"
Next in thread: Khem Raj: "Re: [PATCH] x86/boot/compressed/64: Define __force_order only when CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE is unset"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sat, Dec 21, 2019 at 07:18:13AM -0800, Khem Raj wrote:
> Since arch/x86/boot/compressed/Makefile overrides global CFLAGS it loses
> -fno-common option which would have caught this

If this doesn't cause any visible problems, why bother?

Hopefully, we will be able to drop it altogether once we ditch GCC 4.X
support.

--
Kirill A. Shutemov

Next message: Kai-Heng Feng: "[PATCH v2] drm/i915: Re-init lspcon after HPD if lspcon probe failed"
Previous message: Paolo Bonzini: "Re: [RESEND RFC 0/2] Paravirtualized Control Register pinning"
In reply to: Khem Raj: "[PATCH] x86/boot/compressed/64: Define __force_order only when CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE is unset"
Next in thread: Khem Raj: "Re: [PATCH] x86/boot/compressed/64: Define __force_order only when CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE is unset"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]