Re: [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Re-init lspcon after HPD if lspcon probe failed

From: Kai-Heng Feng
Date: Mon Dec 23 2019 - 12:53:34 EST




> On Dec 24, 2019, at 01:36, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 24 Dec 2019, Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On HP 800 G4 DM, if HDMI cable isn't plugged before boot, the HDMI port
>> becomes useless and never responds to cable hotplugging:
>> [ 3.031904] [drm:lspcon_init [i915]] *ERROR* Failed to probe lspcon
>> [ 3.031945] [drm:intel_ddi_init [i915]] *ERROR* LSPCON init failed on port D
>>
>> Seems like the lspcon chip on the system in question only gets powered
>> after the cable is plugged.
>>
>> So let's call lspcon_init() dynamically to properly initialize the
>> lspcon chip and make HDMI port work.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> v2:
>> - Move lspcon_init() inside of intel_dp_hpd_pulse().
>>
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 6 +++++-
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>> index fe31bbfd6c62..eb395b45527e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>> @@ -6573,6 +6573,7 @@ enum irqreturn
>> intel_dp_hpd_pulse(struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port, bool long_hpd)
>> {
>> struct intel_dp *intel_dp = &intel_dig_port->dp;
>> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
>>
>> if (long_hpd && intel_dig_port->base.type == INTEL_OUTPUT_EDP) {
>> /*
>> @@ -6592,11 +6593,14 @@ intel_dp_hpd_pulse(struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port, bool long_hpd)
>> intel_dig_port->base.base.name,
>> long_hpd ? "long" : "short");
>>
>> - if (long_hpd) {
>> + if (long_hpd && intel_dig_port->base.type != INTEL_OUTPUT_DDI) {
>
> With this change, long hpd handling for DDI on platforms that do not
> have LSPCON, or has an active LSPCON, falls through to the short hpd
> handling. That's not what you're after, is it?

You are right, no :(

I'll send a V3.

Kai-Heng

>
>
> BR,
> Jani.
>
>
>> intel_dp->reset_link_params = true;
>> return IRQ_NONE;
>> }
>>
>> + if (long_hpd && HAS_LSPCON(dev_priv) && !intel_dig_port->lspcon.active)
>> + lspcon_init(intel_dig_port);
>> +
>> if (intel_dp->is_mst) {
>> if (intel_dp_check_mst_status(intel_dp) == -EINVAL) {
>> /*
>
> --
> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center