Re: [RESEND,PATCH 02/13] iommu/mediatek: Add mt6779 IOMMU basic support

From: chao hao
Date: Wed Dec 25 2019 - 02:05:51 EST

Next message: David Miller: "Re: [PATCH net-next v8 00/14] ethtool netlink interface, part 1"
Previous message: 'bhe@xxxxxxxxxx': "Re: [RFD] kdump, kaslr: how to fix the failure of reservation of crashkernel low memory due to physical kaslr"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, 2019-12-16 at 20:07 +0800, Yong Wu wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-11-04 at 19:52 +0800, Chao Hao wrote:
> > 1. Add mt6779 registers define for iommu.
> > 2. Add mt6779_data define to support mt6779 iommu HW init.
> > 3. There are two iommus, one is mm_iommu, the other is vpu_iommu.
> > MM_IOMMU is connected smi_larb to support multimedia engine to
> > access DRAM, and VPU_IOMMU is connected to APU_bus to support
> > VPU,MDLA,EDMA to access DRAM. MM_IOMMU and VPU_IOMMU use the same
> > page table to simplify design by "mtk_iommu_get_m4u_data".
> > 4. For smi_larb6, it doesn't use mm_iommu, so we can distinguish
> > vpu_iommu by it when excutes iommu_probe.
> > 5. For mt6779 APU_IOMMU fault id is irregular, so it was treated
> > specially.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chao Hao <chao.hao@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c | 91 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> > drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.h | 10 ++++-
> > 2 files changed, 87 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> > index 8ca2e99964fe..f2847e661137 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> > @@ -38,12 +38,24 @@
> > #define REG_MMU_INVLD_END_A 0x028
> >
> > #define REG_MMU_INV_SEL 0x038
> > +#define REG_MMU_INV_SEL_MT6779 0x02c
> > #define F_INVLD_EN0 BIT(0)
> > #define F_INVLD_EN1 BIT(1)
> >
> > #define REG_MMU_STANDARD_AXI_MODE 0x048
> > +
> > +#define REG_MMU_MISC_CRTL_MT6779 0x048
>
> Defining two register in the same offset look strange. see below.
>
> > +#define REG_MMU_STANDARD_AXI_MODE_MT6779 (BIT(3) | BIT(19))
> > +#define REG_MMU_COHERENCE_EN (BIT(0) | BIT(16))
> > +#define REG_MMU_IN_ORDER_WR_EN (BIT(1) | BIT(17))
> > +#define F_MMU_HALF_ENTRY_MODE_L (BIT(5) | BIT(21))
> > +#define F_MMU_BLOCKING_MODE_L (BIT(4) | BIT(20))
>
> The last four ones are not used. Please remove.
>
> > +
> > #define REG_MMU_DCM_DIS 0x050
> >
> > +#define REG_MMU_WR_LEN 0x054
> > +#define F_MMU_WR_THROT_DIS (BIT(5) | BIT(21))
> > +
> > #define REG_MMU_CTRL_REG 0x110
> > #define F_MMU_TF_PROT_TO_PROGRAM_ADDR (2 << 4)
> > #define F_MMU_PREFETCH_RT_REPLACE_MOD BIT(4)
> > @@ -88,10 +100,14 @@
> > #define REG_MMU1_INVLD_PA 0x148
> > #define REG_MMU0_INT_ID 0x150
> > #define REG_MMU1_INT_ID 0x154
> > +#define F_MMU_INT_ID_COMM_ID(a) (((a) >> 9) & 0x7)
> > +#define F_MMU_INT_ID_SUB_COMM_ID(a) (((a) >> 7) & 0x3)
> > #define F_MMU_INT_ID_LARB_ID(a) (((a) >> 7) & 0x7)
> > #define F_MMU_INT_ID_PORT_ID(a) (((a) >> 2) & 0x1f)
> > +#define F_MMU_INT_ID_COMM_APU_ID(a) ((a) & 0x3)
> > +#define F_MMU_INT_ID_SUB_APU_ID(a) (((a) >> 2) & 0x3)
> >
> > -#define MTK_PROTECT_PA_ALIGN 128
> > +#define MTK_PROTECT_PA_ALIGN 256
> >
> > /*
> > * Get the local arbiter ID and the portid within the larb arbiter
> > @@ -165,7 +181,7 @@ static void mtk_iommu_tlb_flush_all(void *cookie)
> >
> > for_each_m4u(data) {
> > writel_relaxed(F_INVLD_EN1 | F_INVLD_EN0,
> > - data->base + REG_MMU_INV_SEL);
> > + data->base + data->plat_data->inv_sel_reg);
> > writel_relaxed(F_ALL_INVLD, data->base + REG_MMU_INVALIDATE);
> > wmb(); /* Make sure the tlb flush all done */
> > }
> > @@ -182,7 +198,7 @@ static void mtk_iommu_tlb_flush_range_sync(unsigned long iova, size_t size,
> > for_each_m4u(data) {
> > spin_lock_irqsave(&data->tlb_lock, flags);
> > writel_relaxed(F_INVLD_EN1 | F_INVLD_EN0,
> > - data->base + REG_MMU_INV_SEL);
> > + data->base + data->plat_data->inv_sel_reg);
> >
> > writel_relaxed(iova, data->base + REG_MMU_INVLD_START_A);
> > writel_relaxed(iova + size - 1,
> > @@ -226,7 +242,7 @@ static irqreturn_t mtk_iommu_isr(int irq, void *dev_id)
> > struct mtk_iommu_data *data = dev_id;
> > struct mtk_iommu_domain *dom = data->m4u_dom;
> > u32 int_state, regval, fault_iova, fault_pa;
> > - unsigned int fault_larb, fault_port;
> > + unsigned int fault_larb, fault_port, sub_comm = 0;
> > bool layer, write;
> >
> > /* Read error info from registers */
> > @@ -242,17 +258,30 @@ static irqreturn_t mtk_iommu_isr(int irq, void *dev_id)
> > }
> > layer = fault_iova & F_MMU_FAULT_VA_LAYER_BIT;
> > write = fault_iova & F_MMU_FAULT_VA_WRITE_BIT;
> > - fault_larb = F_MMU_INT_ID_LARB_ID(regval);
> > fault_port = F_MMU_INT_ID_PORT_ID(regval);
> > + if (data->plat_data->has_sub_comm[data->m4u_id]) {
> > + /* m4u1 is VPU in mt6779.*/
> > + if (data->m4u_id && data->plat_data->m4u_plat == M4U_MT6779) {
> > + fault_larb = F_MMU_INT_ID_COMM_APU_ID(regval);
> > + sub_comm = F_MMU_INT_ID_SUB_APU_ID(regval);
> > + fault_port = 0; /* for mt6779 APU ID is irregular */
> > + } else {
> > + fault_larb = F_MMU_INT_ID_COMM_ID(regval);
> > + sub_comm = F_MMU_INT_ID_SUB_COMM_ID(regval);
> > + }
> > + } else {
> > + fault_larb = F_MMU_INT_ID_LARB_ID(regval);
> > + }
> >
> > - fault_larb = data->plat_data->larbid_remap[fault_larb];
> > + fault_larb = data->plat_data->larbid_remap[data->m4u_id][fault_larb];
> >
> > if (report_iommu_fault(&dom->domain, data->dev, fault_iova,
> > write ? IOMMU_FAULT_WRITE : IOMMU_FAULT_READ)) {
> > dev_err_ratelimited(
> > data->dev,
> > - "fault type=0x%x iova=0x%x pa=0x%x larb=%d port=%d layer=%d %s\n",
> > - int_state, fault_iova, fault_pa, fault_larb, fault_port,
> > + "fault type=0x%x iova=0x%x pa=0x%x larb=%d sub_comm=%d port=%d regval=0x%x layer=%d %s\n",
> > + int_state, fault_iova, fault_pa, fault_larb,
> > + sub_comm, fault_port, regval,
> > layer, write ? "write" : "read");
> > }
> >
> > @@ -545,11 +574,12 @@ static int mtk_iommu_hw_init(const struct mtk_iommu_data *data)
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > + regval = readl_relaxed(data->base + REG_MMU_CTRL_REG);
> > if (data->plat_data->m4u_plat == M4U_MT8173)
> > - regval = F_MMU_PREFETCH_RT_REPLACE_MOD |
> > + regval |= F_MMU_PREFETCH_RT_REPLACE_MOD |
> > F_MMU_TF_PROT_TO_PROGRAM_ADDR_MT8173;
> > else
> > - regval = F_MMU_TF_PROT_TO_PROGRAM_ADDR;
> > + regval |= F_MMU_TF_PROT_TO_PROGRAM_ADDR;
> > writel_relaxed(regval, data->base + REG_MMU_CTRL_REG);
> >
> > regval = F_L2_MULIT_HIT_EN |
> > @@ -589,6 +619,20 @@ static int mtk_iommu_hw_init(const struct mtk_iommu_data *data)
> > if (data->plat_data->reset_axi)
> > writel_relaxed(0, data->base + REG_MMU_STANDARD_AXI_MODE);
> >
> > + if (data->plat_data->has_wr_len) {
> > + /* write command throttling mode */
> > + regval = readl_relaxed(data->base + REG_MMU_WR_LEN);
> > + regval &= ~F_MMU_WR_THROT_DIS;
> > + writel_relaxed(regval, data->base + REG_MMU_WR_LEN);
> > + }
> > + /* special settings for mmu0 (multimedia iommu) */
> > + if (data->plat_data->has_misc_ctrl[data->m4u_id]) {
> > + regval = readl_relaxed(data->base + REG_MMU_MISC_CRTL_MT6779);
> > + /* non-standard AXI mode */
> > + regval &= ~REG_MMU_STANDARD_AXI_MODE_MT6779;
> > + writel_relaxed(regval, data->base + REG_MMU_MISC_CRTL_MT6779);
> > + }
>
> 0x48 are REG_MMU_STANDARD_AXI_MODE in both mt8173 and mt8183, while
> it is REG_MMU_MISC_CRTL in mt2712, mt6779 and the latest soc, right? I
> think we can use one defining, like this:
>
> #define REG_MMU_MISC_CTRL 0x48
>
> if (!data->plat_data->has_misc_ctrl[data->m4u_id]) {
> /* Disable standard axi mode while it is
> REG_MMU_STANDARD_AXI_MODE */
> writel_relaxed(0, data->base + REG_MMU_MISC_CTRL);
> } else if (data->m4u_id == 0) {
> regval = readl_relaxed(data->base + REG_MMU_MISC_CTRL);
> regval &= ~REG_MMU_STANDARD_AXI_MODE_MT6779;
> writel_relaxed(regval, data->base + REG_MMU_MISC_CTRL);
> }
>
> Meanwhile remove the setting for REG_MMU_STANDARD_AXI_MODE above.
>
> > +
> > if (devm_request_irq(data->dev, data->irq, mtk_iommu_isr, 0,
> > dev_name(data->dev), (void *)data)) {
> > writel_relaxed(0, data->base + REG_MMU_PT_BASE_ADDR);
> > @@ -678,6 +722,9 @@ static int mtk_iommu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > }
> > data->larb_imu[id].dev = &plarbdev->dev;
> >
> > + if (data->plat_data->m4u1_mask == (1 << id))
> > + data->m4u_id = 1;
> > +
> > component_match_add_release(dev, &match, release_of,
> > compare_of, larbnode);
> > }
> > @@ -731,6 +778,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused mtk_iommu_suspend(struct device *dev)
> > struct mtk_iommu_suspend_reg *reg = &data->reg;
> > void __iomem *base = data->base;
> >
> > + reg->wr_len = readl_relaxed(base + REG_MMU_WR_LEN);
> > reg->standard_axi_mode = readl_relaxed(base +
> > REG_MMU_STANDARD_AXI_MODE);
> > reg->dcm_dis = readl_relaxed(base + REG_MMU_DCM_DIS);
> > @@ -756,6 +804,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused mtk_iommu_resume(struct device *dev)
> > dev_err(data->dev, "Failed to enable clk(%d) in resume\n", ret);
> > return ret;
> > }
> > + writel_relaxed(reg->wr_len, base + REG_MMU_WR_LEN);
> > writel_relaxed(reg->standard_axi_mode,
> > base + REG_MMU_STANDARD_AXI_MODE);
> > writel_relaxed(reg->dcm_dis, base + REG_MMU_DCM_DIS);
> > @@ -779,7 +828,20 @@ static const struct mtk_iommu_plat_data mt2712_data = {
> > .has_4gb_mode = true,
> > .has_bclk = true,
> > .has_vld_pa_rng = true,
> > - .larbid_remap = {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9},
> > + .larbid_remap[0] = {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9},
> > + .inv_sel_reg = REG_MMU_INV_SEL,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct mtk_iommu_plat_data mt6779_data = {
> > + .m4u_plat = M4U_MT6779,
> > + .larbid_remap[0] = {0, 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 10, 9},
> > + /* vp6a, vp6b, mdla/core2, mdla/edmc*/
> > + .larbid_remap[1] = {2, 0, 3, 1},
> > + .has_sub_comm = {true, true},
> > + .has_wr_len = true,
> > + .has_misc_ctrl = {true, false},
> > + .inv_sel_reg = REG_MMU_INV_SEL_MT6779,
> > + .m4u1_mask = BIT(6),
> > };
> >
> > static const struct mtk_iommu_plat_data mt8173_data = {
> > @@ -787,17 +849,20 @@ static const struct mtk_iommu_plat_data mt8173_data = {
> > .has_4gb_mode = true,
> > .has_bclk = true,
> > .reset_axi = true,
> > - .larbid_remap = {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5}, /* Linear mapping. */
> > + .larbid_remap[0] = {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5}, /* Linear mapping. */
> > + .inv_sel_reg = REG_MMU_INV_SEL,
> > };
> >
> > static const struct mtk_iommu_plat_data mt8183_data = {
> > .m4u_plat = M4U_MT8183,
> > .reset_axi = true,
> > - .larbid_remap = {0, 4, 5, 6, 7, 2, 3, 1},
> > + .larbid_remap[0] = {0, 4, 5, 6, 7, 2, 3, 1},
> > + .inv_sel_reg = REG_MMU_INV_SEL,
> > };
> >
> > static const struct of_device_id mtk_iommu_of_ids[] = {
> > { .compatible = "mediatek,mt2712-m4u", .data = &mt2712_data},
> > + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt6779-m4u", .data = &mt6779_data},
> > { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-m4u", .data = &mt8173_data},
> > { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8183-m4u", .data = &mt8183_data},
> > {}
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.h b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.h
> > index ea949a324e33..132dc765a40b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.h
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.h
> > @@ -25,11 +25,13 @@ struct mtk_iommu_suspend_reg {
> > u32 int_main_control;
> > u32 ivrp_paddr;
> > u32 vld_pa_rng;
> > + u32 wr_len;
> > };
> >
> > enum mtk_iommu_plat {
> > M4U_MT2701,
> > M4U_MT2712,
> > + M4U_MT6779,
> > M4U_MT8173,
> > M4U_MT8183,
> > };
> > @@ -42,7 +44,12 @@ struct mtk_iommu_plat_data {
> > bool has_bclk;
> > bool has_vld_pa_rng;
> > bool reset_axi;
> > - unsigned char larbid_remap[MTK_LARB_NR_MAX];
> > + bool has_sub_comm[2];
> > + bool has_wr_len;
> > + bool has_misc_ctrl[2];
> > + u32 inv_sel_reg;
> > + u32 m4u1_mask;
>
> alphabetically for the new ones.
>
> > + unsigned char larbid_remap[2][MTK_LARB_NR_MAX];
> > };
> >
> > struct mtk_iommu_domain;
> > @@ -59,6 +66,7 @@ struct mtk_iommu_data {
> > bool enable_4GB;
> > spinlock_t tlb_lock; /* lock for tlb range flush */
> >
> > + u32 m4u_id;
> > struct iommu_device iommu;
> > const struct mtk_iommu_plat_data *plat_data;
>
> Basically this patch looks ok for me. But please split it to several
> patches:
>
> 1) Extend larbid_remap to larbid_remap[2].
> Actually mt2712 also need this. this is the mt2712 definition.
> larbid_remap[0] = {0, 1, 2, 3},
> larbid_remap[1] = {4, 5, 7, 8, 9},
>
> 2) Regarding the 0x48(misc_ctrl register)
>
> 3) Add m4u1_mask to distinguish the m4u_id.
>
> 4) Add REG_MMU_WR_LEN if you need.
>
> 5) Put inv_sel_reg in the plat_data for preparing add 0x2c support in
> mt6779.
>
> 6) Add new flow to get SUB_COMMON ID and VPU larbid in the translation
> fault.
>
> 7) Add mt6779 support.
>
> >

ok, I will modify them for your above comments in next version, thanks

>
>
>

Next message: David Miller: "Re: [PATCH net-next v8 00/14] ethtool netlink interface, part 1"
Previous message: 'bhe@xxxxxxxxxx': "Re: [RFD] kdump, kaslr: how to fix the failure of reservation of crashkernel low memory due to physical kaslr"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]