Re: [PATCH] fs: inode: Recycle inodenum from volatile inode slabs

[Chris Down]

zhengbin (A) writes:
> How about tmpfs and hugetlbfs use their own get_next_ino? like
>
> static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned int, tmpfs_last_ino),
>
> which can reduce the risk of 32 bit wraparound further.

This won't help by itself, because in the case presented the wraparound almost 
solely comes from shmem alone.