[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 105/187] habanalabs: rate limit error msg on waiting for CS

[Sasha Levin]

From: Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay@xxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit 018e0e3594f7dcd029d258e368c485e742fa9cdb ]

In case a user submits a CS, and the submission fails, and the user doesn't
check the return value and instead use the error return value as a valid
sequence number of a CS and ask to wait on it, the driver will print an
error and return an error code for that wait.

The real problem happens if now the user ignores the error of the wait, and
try to wait again and again. This can lead to a flood of error messages
from the driver and even soft lockup event.

Signed-off-by: Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay@xxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Tomer Tayar <ttayar@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/misc/habanalabs/command_submission.c | 5 +++--
 drivers/misc/habanalabs/context.c            | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/misc/habanalabs/command_submission.c b/drivers/misc/habanalabs/command_submission.c
index a9ac045dcfde..447f307ef4d6 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/habanalabs/command_submission.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/habanalabs/command_submission.c
@@ -777,8 +777,9 @@ int hl_cs_wait_ioctl(struct hl_fpriv *hpriv, void *data)
 	memset(args, 0, sizeof(*args));
 
 	if (rc < 0) {
-		dev_err(hdev->dev, "Error %ld on waiting for CS handle %llu\n",
-			rc, seq);
+		dev_err_ratelimited(hdev->dev,
+				"Error %ld on waiting for CS handle %llu\n",
+				rc, seq);
 		if (rc == -ERESTARTSYS) {
 			args->out.status = HL_WAIT_CS_STATUS_INTERRUPTED;
 			rc = -EINTR;
diff --git a/drivers/misc/habanalabs/context.c b/drivers/misc/habanalabs/context.c
index 17db7b3dfb4c..2df6fb87e7ff 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/habanalabs/context.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/habanalabs/context.c
@@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ struct dma_fence *hl_ctx_get_fence(struct hl_ctx *ctx, u64 seq)
 	spin_lock(&ctx->cs_lock);
 
 	if (seq >= ctx->cs_sequence) {
-		dev_notice(hdev->dev,
+		dev_notice_ratelimited(hdev->dev,
 			"Can't wait on seq %llu because current CS is at seq %llu\n",
 			seq, ctx->cs_sequence);
 		spin_unlock(&ctx->cs_lock);
-- 
2.20.1